Worse for slapping choppers and overpressuring light vehicles, which are the only reasons to use M830A1
I mean why in the first place. I tried it and managed to get it eaten by 2S38 for breakfast.
what?
thats insane man was?
why and Что?
quoi? sources did they use to nerf it?
they once changed a plane’s weight by like 1 gram
They will say so if they make it live.
R-37M can pull hard.
Look at the rear control surfaces.
I really want it because it would be silly to use in the game.
3 Likes
Unfortunately, we’re probably a good bit away from it. (Tho it will be funny to swat aircraft out of the air from 400km :])
1 Like
It’s rare you find people who understand this.
1 Like
same for me but problem is that the r-37 has more range than what the biggest maps in WT are currently (e.g. Spain, Afgahnistan, Denmark)
1 Like
In the recent datamine. The M908 and the M830A1 are expected to see its explosive filler go to 0.966 from 1.38.
well i dont see what is so difficult to understand there
a good example is the Aim-9b, you dont need to pull more than 5g to out-pull that missile even tho it has 10Gs of pull
like ofc the missile has to be able to pull more than the plane it wants to hit, it needs to pull lead
2 Likes
it was mb
i thought you were talking about the APFSDS the abrams gets
and the reduction in explosive filler is likely the result of a bug-report
1 Like
I mean most of the ARH won’t hit unless you fire halfway into their NEZ at like 18km even though their statcard range is 80+ due to lofting.
well it would be quite similar to the phoenix
you would be able to force the entire enemy team to go defensive at the start of the match becuase multipathing against missiles with bigger warheads isnt that reliable
and you just can gain a maasive advantedge in positioning by that
1 Like
No it doesn’t. It doesn’t set any precedent, and instead uses the same exact rule started over a decade ago; and in this case for Italian export aircraft in the Italian tech tree.
I think it doesn’t matter much against current top tier FM.
We get told there are no rules but yet Italy hasn’t gotten it’s first squadron vehicle which it started in 2019 7 years ago.
So 7 years Italy have yet to get a squadron vehicle and you tell me that not out of spite.
Even Israel out of all nations got at least one, so who are the people so bent on not giving Italy one ?
3 Likes
And Still Russians would complain when they get slapped by a 120D
@Deathmisser
A tech tree not having a squadron vehicle is not anything other than they haven’t found and developed a vehicle that wouldn’t otherwise fill a hole while still being neat.
Lack of vehicles is never malice, otherwise the 1 whole year without a tank the Soviet tech tree went through you’d have to see that as anti-Soviet by such a standard, when in reality the tree was healthy and focus was laid elsewhere; no malice, just finding cool vehicles regardless of nation.
Israel’s squadron vehicle is a unique Magach that fills no holes. Patience is required in life.
