so why didnt Britain a Su-30MKI or a CF-18 last update?
because they already had the Eurofighter, this was stated multiple times already
2 Likes
Read that part again “this update or another”, you do understand what another means, and comparing Japan to Britain is honestly laughable.
4 Likes
you did the same before
Sweden might get the F-18C MLU1 next update. Wouldn’t be much work on Gaijin’s part.
they would have to make a different cockpit so that means we have to wait atlest 2 or 3 more updates
Wasn’t it the MLU 2 that was confirmed to be coming? (Smin said it would “at a later time” right after last update so it could happen now)
I don’t see them going to the MLU2 so quickly but they might skip the MLU1
I hope not. just add it foldered with Aim 120C5
I’m sure =/= it not gonna happen. You claimed the Korean F-15 will not happen, you were trying to use that as fact’s where in this moment in time we do not know where Korea will go.
When I’ve said I’m sure that not fact’s I’m making a educated guess, your statement wasn’t an educated guess, you’d tried to claim it was a fact
1 Like
All it would really require is the cockpit to be changed. Although they might be waiting for the 9Xs to give the MLU1 which makes me concerned with how long it will take.
Smin confimed there are no plans for multiple F-18’s for sweden regarding the MLU, additionally the next F-18 is confirmed to be the MLU 2. Additionally there are no plans for more F18’s after this model so yes they are skipping MLU 1
Just the casual we see that the tech tree currently lacks any useful vehicles for air so enjoy getting the worst model while we skip the one that should’ve beeen added because modeling a unique cockpit and making the Finnish one on par A2A wise would take away from the uniqueness of the US. (Paraphrasing but yes this was offcial logic given by him, “uniqueness”)
Ok back to my hibernation/vacation from this horrible place
3 Likes
and not wanted with hindsight.
been nothing but cruddy C&P of USSR vehicles. If I wanted to play them id play USSR, not Britain
2 Likes
If only this logic was consistent with stuff like the CF-18
That logic never works since we have tech in game now that isn’t independent so if I want to play Canadian tech I can’t play Canada because it’s not their.
2 Likes
It’s hardly Canadian tech. The only thing Canadian about it is the C and lack of /A
I was more thinking of the RAM’s and Skink
3 Likes
That’s fair, both chassis are American design but the actual shooting bits are Canadian
“They utilized American technology (Sherman chassis for the Skink, M3 components for the Ram), but their designs, especially the turrets and intended roles, were Canadian.”
“In summary, the Skink and Ram are Canadian designs, not American, though they incorporate American chassis and components. Their development reflects Canada’s adaptation of U.S. technology to meet specific wartime requirements.”
Even AI disagrees with you on that one
2 Likes
That’s literally what I said but AI