And even that the littorio is known for poor accuracy. Plus the pugleisei system isnt properly modelled referring to cavour or novossyrisk.
You are a very beautiful man, thank you
At least Italy gets arguably the best capital ship camouflages in the game. France has the worst by far.
Cause style points are all that matter obviously.
There is this issue that has been around for long and I bet it’s not hard to solve, probably just an oversight
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Bk3wSxeDRr8e
I am curious when we will get proper missile ships in WT
Command-LOS and IR homing antiair types could probably come at any time, since they’re both already ingame. The more advanced types like ARH seem more likely to be after they finish adding battleships this year.
It’s 50/50. If de-capping plate works then its one of the best possible armoured ships. If it doesn’t then it goes to being one of the worst. Not significantly better (arguably worse) than the KGV with 1 less gun but more penetration albeit a worse internal layout. Guns would basically make it as good as a Colorado or Mutsu or Rodney, roughly their equivalent.
So TL;DR good addition now if de-capping plate doesn’t work. OP if de-capping plate does work.
Really Italy should get the Guilio Cesare present in Russian tree, i get not having the same ship in two refits in the same tree, but no reason for that to be the case if they are in different trees, also its an Italian ship, if Russia doesn’t have alternatives its a Russia problem, not an Italy problem until you steal an Italian ship from the Italians.
VT-1 is more or less the same size as aim9 though
except it’s pointy, and as we all know, pointy is better
i’m going to make the call that it’s probably going to be a bit after the introduction of submarines
Yesterday the booker is cancelled. It never made it into war thunder in its limited production time, a big bruh for all the players.
Indeed, plus it would be unique. Altough I’m still hoping it’s the Huckebein, at least it was partially built.
But yeah realistically of course it will be the IAe33.
ehh I dont see it, I cant see submarines ever being fun to play in warthunder
The article leads to believe that they are either going top of the line BBs for those who have smaller BBs (treaty ships, like Littorio or Richelieu), or they are going to go full steam ahead and add big ships to everyone. That means Iowas and Yamato, which i’m not sure will be that OP on current maps compared to other ships tbh.
they said in one Q&A that they were currently working on ships class “different to the one currently represented in game”, and i’m not gonna lie, i don’t see what else it can be.
Here @Smugspite
The M551 will never get a true successor at this rate :(
M10 is joining the M8 on the Island of US light tank rejects now.
Can’t be surprised unfortunately. Although it is amusing to see the “not a light tank” get canceled cause of weight concerns. Which I get why they said it wasn’t a light tank with it weighing about the same as a T-80U.
I guess Jenny Craig for tanks wasn’t in the defense budget this year :/
Yeah. US Army’s actual designation for it was an assault gun. So I do wonder if it is to make it’s way to WT if they would put it as an LT or a TD? I think TD would be more fitting.
Either way I think the loss was less than 2 Billion in development so it didn’t go to crazy into budget.
Yeah, 100000000% sure.
I really want to try play on Canadian C2A1 but it was event.
at the same time, people who own it didn’t play on it.
who will oust OTOMATI in the Italian branch?