Why? They do not have nearly as good of relationships as america and south korea and japan does not need to siphon more American tech.
Yeah it should’ve been added with the F-15E imho. It is a upgrade F-16 but japan needs it because they haven’t made any domestic designs.
1 Like
downgrade in case of BFM, BVR… and basicly anything that isnt missile amount.(TBH AAM-4 are performing better in wt due to bad BVR representation).
Based off what i’ve heard they are slightly better than Aim-9m’s
What nation does Italy have that operate the F/A-18C?
Rest seems believable…we will have an F-22 and Su-47 before Gaijin fixes Typhoons Radar
1 Like
Another bogus list, huh?
ima make one too
Can you put the 737 on there?
1 Like
Many things point out that to be a fake list, but you could have at least tried to be credible where possible.
For one, nobody it makes sense for the UK to get a Hornet from uses an F/A-18C.
Missile amount is also questionable considering the outer MRM stations were scrapped and the inner stations are unconfirmed for AAMs, so unless Gaijin find more on inner stations using AAMs (which would make it 6 BVR + 4 WVR) it’s limited to only 4 BVR missiles. Sure, it gets 4 WVR missiles with that, but couldn’t carry the 6 BVR missiles the F-16 can.
Then again I wouldn’t call it a straight downgrade for BVR still, since the J/APG-2 AESA radar would be superior to the F-16Cs AN/APG-68. With proper J/ARG-1 datalink system, the AAM-4 missiles would get full combined guidance from both the missile seeker and plane radar at the same time all the way to impact, which could actually make the F-2 the superior BVR plane for that reason again, but that is only if they implement it, which for the F-15J(M) they already forgot.
For WVR fights I’d say it’s more of a sidegrade. The added agility would come at a cost of energy retention (unless we get ME FCS mode) and it never used HMD. AAM-3 is superior to the AIM-9M, but the F-2 can only carry them on outer and wingtip stations for a total maximum of 4, and unless Gaijin get around to giving them their real IRCCM and maneuvering capabilities they’re not even much better in the first place.
3 Likes
god I hope not the UK doesnt need a Su30 or Mirage2k
difference is japan needs the help the US really doesn’t, so instead of the majority of the possible additions just being skins they would be actual vics in a tree
I think spain operates F/A-18Cs?
Couldn’t get very creative
2 Likes
unironically some of those would be really fun, the BMD-2M, Panhard ERC and centauro 2 would all be fun light tanks
need a tech tree BMD at this point((
2 Likes
also I feel the zorawar would be a very mid light tank, would only have a 105, and its max speed is 70km/h on road which is about as much as the average MBT at the br it would be, its cross country is a dreadful 40km/h where most actual mbts would be faster then it
I think it depends on multiple factors. The VT-5 also “only” has a 105mm gun and is a really potent LT in game currently, which is why it’s moving up to 11.0.
I don’t know too much about it but I assume it’s performance will depend on it’s BR. Though doesn’t seem like it will be as good as Chinese LT’s or CV90105/120.
eh maybe I just dont see it it looks rather slow for a light tank, I also am not sure if its ATGMs are FnF or not if they arent thats a massive downside at top tier