Yeah but India is not planned to move out of Britain and I don’t think British mains would be happy about a Fulcrum in their tech tree, so…
Tho the Mig-29K could be put in the Russian tree as Indian, wouldn’t be the first time they put a vehicle out of its subtree in another nation
Every experienced British mains I asked are strongly rejecting Sovietic-made Indian vehicles, they say it doesn’t belong (which I agree with) and UK lacks many historical vehicles (which I also agree with)
I know, but it’s the same for like half of game nations, it’s like that and imo it’s not that bad. The Tejas can maybe work in the British tree but fulcrums and flankers really don’t belong, that would be like putting algerian Su-30MKAs and Su-35Ss in the French tree
SU-30MKI being heavily Indianised, Indian requirements and Indian built with being its primary jet fighter for a long time would be a good example of a “Russianesque” vehicle to the UK TT “done well” if added at the right time. Similar to the T90 in my view. Not really just a blank copy (though the T90 was added at a bad time imo).
Not really as Algeria isnt a sub tree for France.
Su-30MKII is also heavilly modified with British/Israeli/Swedish systems. It is being configured for ASRAAM and ASTRA missiles.
India is the largest operator of the Su-30 and India is a British sub tree…If it was to be added Britain would make the most sense.
Yeah, if gaijin added it at the same time as a Hawk 200/Harrier GR9/new eurofighter or something I would think that would be reasonable/fine though. It all depends on when/what its added with on how people react I wager. (none of that “got copy paste instead of unique” issue)
The problem is, the Indian Su-30s are still capable of firing most Russian warfare, and if we start mixing all the tech in tech trees they’ll all lose their uniqueness