Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Yee, had this bug also but with an German F-18(Yes, German/sadly in the end it was the US Premium version which somehow turned up in Germany)and an German Eurofighter

Zusammenfassung


1 Like

Bug Thunder
I’ve been seeing enemy chat messages (like drone pings) occasionally pop up in my chat and on my mini-map.
Also, does the Obj 292 have blowout panels for the charges? I swear it used to, but I got hit in the charges and exploded. On top of that, I’m loading it with only APFSDS shells, yet still explode when the rounds in the carousel get hit.
Gaijin, fix your game.

Why is it that people always say it’s a copy and paste of Germany, Russia I understand but Germany, some captured tanks and leopards which we are planning to retire soon anyway.

You do understand, that it’s AI, right?

7 Likes

It’s this wonderful thing called the Warsaw Pact that Poland was under.

Yeah but what does that thing have to do with Germany?

Post Warsaw Pact: Leopard MBTs. You could argue Poland using German WWII equipment too.

1 Like

Dont think so

Meh, to be honest we used American equipment way more than German, F-16, Sherman’s, Abram’s etc.

2 Likes

Yeah it’s a real mix bag of all really even more so when more eastern bloc nations will start joining them

The american Voodoo 2 variants to researchable tree, my guess

But, british tech tree get canadian voodoo ?

USN fighter aircraft 8.7 ~ 9.0 before F3H-2, and 9.3 ~ 10.0 before F8U-2

F-15EX ?

F-16CM with AN/APG-83 SABR (Scalable Agile Beam Radar) AESA radar.

Located after F-16C Block 50, but battle rating 14.7 minimum

F/A-18E Block I (early) or F/A-18E Block II (late) for american tech tree ?

1 other nation might be Aussie F/A-18F (Block II standard)

A Su-32 or Su-34E would be a better choice for a premium. The Su-34M should be a TT addition.

1 Like

Either all of these unrealistic vehicles should stay or all of them should be hidden and banned from being used in Sim modes.

Where possible a realistic version should also be added (Panther II without the 88, Panther F in the F turret (Schmalturm) on G hull configuration, the real Ho-Ri).

But to be honest I’d just prefer if they just kept these vehicles available to everyone, make the Tiger 2 10.5 more realistic by reworking the turret layout (no more rangefinder), and otherwise just accept unfinished vehicles if the designs were plausible (the suggestions rules seem like a fair standard).

1 Like

I wouldn’t mind a healthy mix of both.

On one hand I’d like them to stay so long as they are historical and not just “based on historical”, like the R2Y2s with engine configurations and cannons that the real design never had. (And in those cases fix them to be historical, or at least replace them with historical versions)
But even then I feel like there needs to be a clear cut line. There’s fully historical paper designs that really never went past the idea stage and just literally don’t have the information needed, and that might be too far. But going with a fishy “we do what we feel like” approach to filter these out is just plain unfair to players.
So personally I like the suggestion rules, the unfinished prototype. If any vehicle specific part was constructed, it’s an unfinished prototype. If a vehicle is that or anything more, it can be added, if not it’s not.

But then on the other hand, I can see even a historical Ho-Ri being a pain for a Sim player. Sim battles might go for more historically aligned lineup selections, maybe even as a rotating event thing. Or maybe have a sim setting where you can have vehicles tagged as Historical (used in service), Semi-Historical (finished, non-service) or Ahistorical (Unfinished) and then just get matched with others that use similar tags. Make the default historical, give a pop-up to allow other vehicles if you put any in your lineups.

3 Likes

That tag idea is good. Just one thing is needed with that, a tag or something for them to not face historically used foreign vehicles, if they don’t want to(I’m sure their some who do want to fight foreign vehicles, for LARP reason or something).

2 Likes

@Smin1080p_WT May I ask, are you aware if its planned or not in the plans?
Be able to reload Fire extinguisher,
Because we have now so many sources which can start an fire, but still only 2 FPEs which we cant reload, while we can reload EVERYTHING else on an Cap point

5 Likes

Too many tanks, definetly need more aircraft, its been a while since we had an air focused update :P

You said more CAS?
We got you
)))

Yep, OTOMATIC is too OP at top tier. So we need Spear-3s with LOAL on the Typhoon

1 Like

HELL YEA, this proves clearly SPEAR 3 is needed ))))

Zusammenfassung