100% need a meteor mk.1
Would it ever be possible to have 15+ variants of 3 related airframes in 1 tree?
I do wonder as to why you want this
Ah well.
I am firmly of opinion that UK should have gotten the event meteor, or as a TT though.
well theres 16 magach variants in the Israeli tree so its not beyond gaijin to add the same slop in such high volumes in a single tree
We already have it as a premium
It just cannot take as pretty of a picture as the FR9 can
this one?
Yeah tbh we wouldn’t really care how it comes even if it’s like a yearly pack, just odd how we never really seem to get our night fighter variants of our aircraft. But as I say 5 lines are now causing issues for tech trees but dev’s seems to be putting more effort for a stupid hockey game than actually tech trees better.
This should be an event F.1
The actual F.1 that was in service should be in the tech tree
i want both. i know the prop meteor would be pretty mid as it doesn’t have the muscle to throw the airframe about but 4x nose hispanos does the lords work
I suppose Meteor NF Mk.11, Meteor NF Mk.12 and Meteor NF Mk.14 from RAF to researchable tree
BR 6.7 or 7.0 ?
Because Meteor F Mk.1 it’s the first jet fighter for RAF in world war 2
Yep. I just don’t remember if the Soviet ones got any
The first event vehicle rank V for britain maybe Meteor F.1 Trent ?
Gajin might add Meteor 4 variants to regular tech tree and 1 variant to premium tree for great britain tech tree
Spoiler
- Meteor F Mk 1
- Meteor NF Mk.11
- Meteor NF Mk.12
- Meteor NF Mk.13 (RAF) (regular pack or the early squadron)
- Meteor NF Mk.14
Tho you actually need multiple Vehicles for ground matches, so it makes more sense to spam stuff there than air
would have to be 7.0. Jets any lower is a little unfair with British pilots
such C&P laziness isnt below gaijin was my point.
Israel didn’t have to be like this at all
British tech tree lack 1st gen jet fighter aircraft 6.7 ~ 7.0
Meteor F Mk.1 for researchable tree
But, engine worse than Meteor F Mk.3 ?
Hello. Its not planned for the foreseeable future (certainly not the next update).
Its intentionally not active and this would also drastically alter the BR of the vehicle, since it was spesifically sold and introduced without ASMs. As such, its not a bug.
Please see my previous response:
That was never in dispute :)