Its more so a bug, i may need to redo the report but the main focus is that both Finnish T-34 have the add on armor weight added to them depsite not having the add on armor. Its a bug which was discussed in the comments, i can remake the report if needed but thats what it ended up as in the end.
.2t of weight has been given to them as their base weight which matches the soviet models when the add on armor is equiped so its just from gaijin copying the soviet stats over but forgetting to fix the weight.
if i did that for each of my reports, smin and gunjob would have a restraining order on me
Trust me, my List Of Outstanding Bugs is long and distinguished
Please do not. Its bad enough getting spam tagged. Please do not go and pester every moderator when you don’t get an answer from one. Moderators are volunteers who give their free time to contribute here. They are also humans with lives and are also players themselves too. Like all our community moderators (Forum, GM, Wiki, Live etc).
Spamming them does not help or make them process your request faster.
Bug reports are for when the vehicle is added and not having a dev server and not testing something.
As I said rushed and added to the game after multiple dev servers in a broken state.
Britain received 1 (2) vehicles in the last update and Gaijin couldn’t even get one vehicle right.
As has already been explained and answered before. Tornado GR.4 was always planned to be added with Mk 103 engines. GR.1 has 101s intentionally as there is difference and progression between the two. Among other things.
Ah, yeah ill need to find my books and just post their covers and pages i guess. I don’t really get why i need so much info when its fairly obvious it was a bug but i get it, ill have to remake it later this week once im off work.
So… Why was this not done for either Germany or especially italy?
They litereally have a TT Tornado IDS with a loadout that is actually accurate for the timeframe that the Mk101 engines were in service, and yet even the Tornado IDS (early) in the Italian TT in game has Mk103 engines.
Likewise, the Tornado A200A could equally have come with Mk101 engines and the recently added Tornado A200C could have come with Mk103 engines and yet, also did not.
Im sorry, but this notion that we have to have an ahistoric engine on the Tornado GR1, just because of this exceedingly strange notion of “progression” when the same isnt applied to the other 2 nations is just insane. Especially when combined with the incorrect BR
If you really want to create a feeling of progression, then add a Tornado Gr1 (early) with Mk101 engines and a loadout appropriate from the 1970/80s, but the GR1 with TIALD is from the mid ot late 1990s and is just insane to still have Mk101 engines as a clear and intentional nerf that can only be interpreted as an intential “Anti-Britain” nerf.
This is a waste of both of our times I understand you are towing the party line.
The Rapier making it to the live server in the it’s current state, is a disgrace
If there is evidence to support that, then it can be reported and passed for consideration.
If a need for an earlier Tornado to be split off arises, then it can be reconsidered at that time. But for the current aircraft, it is as it is intended.
But we can’t report the Tornado Gr1 having the incorrect engines based upon the timeframe of its current loadout, but we can report the Tornado IDS (early) having a choice between 2 different engines?
Mk103 isnt incorrect, they were ALL upgraded at the same time, but that having been said, the idea why Britain is being artificially nerfed is entirely and completely contradicted by the fact the IDS early gets the better engine
As would I. Im fed up of having to deal with the 11.7 BR when it should be 11.3 and as Britain has no top tier GRB line-up having one for 10.0 for the 10.X GRB line-up would be fun
