Hey. Its just the AIM-9M. Since this missile was introduced for all Gripens.
Its is intended to be called that.
Hey. Its just the AIM-9M. Since this missile was introduced for all Gripens.
Its is intended to be called that.
I am on about the RB74 for the JA37 and AJS37
It is represented as a pure 9L in game which isnt accurate/historic
sorry if i wasnt clear
JA37D
Oh apologies, I thought you meant the RB74(M).
If it can be proven RB74 is AIM-9LI standard, that can indeed be reported. However due to balance, it may cause RB74 to be changed to a standard AIM-9L anyway. As this is what the aircraft are balanced on.
JAS37Di would at least benefit from it greatly
I believe i have thought of a way to balance it but due to the fact the evidence is still classified to prove the years of some stuff I cannot make a report or suggestion
The JA37 Countermeasures are classified (the detailed manual) so my idea of a base JA37 replacing the JA37C and essentially moving each one down a name
JA37C → JA37
RB24J + RB71
JA37D → JA37C
RB74 + RB71B
JA37Di → JA37D (The Di aspect isnt even modelled in game so would be fine)
RB74M + RB99
The JA37C, as it would be called with this, has an upgraded Skyflash and 9Li to account for being 12.3 or 12.7 but the rest become balanced or remain the same
Another option is to Add a separate JA37D with RB74 (Li) and RB71B and keep the Di as is
This would also be more historical
There is already a bug report to show it should have it
Their ratings will crash like never before. they can remove the forum but not the ability to leave reviews.
You need to chill and play another game lol, its not that serious, using my Danish future sight i can tell you people will be disappointed with vehicles in the next patch.
mate, I’m chill. The AI exaggerated a bit lol
I think I’m going to enjoy this update
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/wUHHzvkzZVo9
I’d rather you or someone who has time read this as my last RB74 bug reports were plagued by the tech mod not reading the full report
If you need more data I can probably get more but i dont want to pester people for it
Unironically could be 1 of the best SAM systems added to WT vs BR (for those who are able to use MCLOS systems well and have good pings).
Forwarded.
I hope italy gets the Littorio, they’ve only got 1 BB that’s around WW2 standard.
And even that the littorio is known for poor accuracy. Plus the pugleisei system isnt properly modelled referring to cavour or novossyrisk.
You are a very beautiful man, thank you
At least Italy gets arguably the best capital ship camouflages in the game. France has the worst by far.
Cause style points are all that matter obviously.
There is this issue that has been around for long and I bet it’s not hard to solve, probably just an oversight
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Bk3wSxeDRr8e
I am curious when we will get proper missile ships in WT
Command-LOS and IR homing antiair types could probably come at any time, since they’re both already ingame. The more advanced types like ARH seem more likely to be after they finish adding battleships this year.