That would fall into the same category as the F-111C. As stated by the CMs before.
is still kinda dumb the germans got the best hunter variant because they lacked CAS (they now have better CAS at a lower BR then the british lmao)
1 Like
While looking at various LAV related stuff, found out that Japan’s Ministry of Defence chose GLDS-Canada to provide LAV-6.0 to replace Japan’s aging Type-96 back in 2019, although GDLS-Canada backed out of the deal in 2021, if the Japanese Brochure was enough for the F-16, then surely Japan can also get a Canadian LAV-6.0 if its implemented to the game lmao (Im not being serious about adding to Japan)
3 Likes
Never said I agree with it look at my position with the KF-41
Ok so? Make a suggestion to give Japan the LAV.
It was in regards to an earlier conversation, has nothing to do with you lol.
I know Smug and Ryder would’ve gotten a kick outta it, was also just a weird thing to come across
1 Like
the thing with the KF41 is it was never intended for german markets and the sole operator of the tank is in the game as a sub tree, the swiss even years later still aren’t a sub tree of germany, and the hunter unlike the KF41 wasn’t something built specifically for the foreign market it was just a modification
2 Likes
Maybe I should make a suggestion to put it in the Japanese tree? 🤔
I know how they feel about Canada being put in multiple trees?
Canadian Lancaster’s in UK, CF-101 in USA, Leo 2A6M in Germany
There is no such nation of origin rule, and hasn’t for years (it’s more correct to say it’s more likely but not guaranteed)
Gaijin adds tech whatever Nation they feel needed if their is no home.
Take the Indian T-90 didn’t come with an Indian sub-tree (that can nearly a year later). Instead cane with an announcement that Gaijin would add vehicles from any Commonwealth nation if the UK could uses it. (Along with indicating the UK will have higher priority on where domestic vehicles have come with nations would be placed)
There’s plenty more examples of Nations getting vehicles they shouldn’t have in the first place, some come with a sub-tree announcement down the line but it’s not guaranteed.
3 Likes
I know what you mean. But the german military did look into iirc. They just deemed it not what they needed.
1 Like
Isn’t there now?
IRIAF, M1A1 AIM, Brazilian AMX, Su-25BM, that one Spanish operated Italian wheeled cannon thing
Oh, that, one. I remember seeing about that.
Actually if I recall would have been told correctly, Thailand uses Strykers allowing Japan to get a member of the LAV family.
3 Likes
its .3 BR higher then the F6 and has better AAM, FnF missile (the UK dont get their first FnF missile until 10.7) and actually has countermeasures and a decent bit for 10.0
You are aware that chart is for what operator nation it’s to be suggested under(and added to the game), not what tree it’s in game would be.
How convenient that you missed this part of my message:
On top of 15x F-15,s, Arab nations, Commonwealth nations and nations that have good relationships with the US. And you still ask for more ?
2 Likes
Suggestions will go for implementation into TTs. As stated before. Exceptions have and will be made to certain vehicles.
Didn’t we both agree Saudi wouldn’t work?
Just means that Canada exports a good amount of things tbh.
Look at the CL-13, its in the German and Italian trees.
Canada donated modified Mosquitos to China.
There’s the Skink and CANADATS in the British tree.
Apart from that, a good chunk of Canadian stuff is in the British tree.
And Canada just doesn’t make sense to be in the Japanese tree.
There’s already been Canadian planes/jets approved by the suggestion mods for the British tree such as the CF-100 series.
1 Like