I think that goes into the issue germans have with getting another certain tank in the Italian tree.
Because while built in Switzerland it’s not used by the Swiss.
yeah I know im making a joke lol
General Dynamics Land Systems- Canada
Do include the other 99% of the name.
2 Likes
I know it was a joke. But it has it’s place in a point about a certain other vehicle. One that rhymes with porty pun.
while looking into lav variants came across this accursed thing
You mean the subdivision of GD. Why would he include the full name?
the same reason you would for the Ajax as its being built by General Dynamics - UK
or the CV-90 as its BAE Systems AB
That was the Marines interest in the HSTV-L.
1 Like
You are aware he’s doing that to erase any Canadian involvement in the Canadian vehicle so he can claim it as pure American?
So I’m assuming your agree with his take then,
I don’t know why you would want to get i to specifics that like oh it “BAE America”. It’s BAE.
Assume what you want. I have always been to the point. None of this double talk like some people look to do.
because otherwise people will start trying to claim stuff that they dont actually have a right to claim lol again Ajax and CV90
1 Like
I don’t say BAE inc. every time I refer to BAE electronics in US aircraft
Gaijin has a weird stance on who gets what. It first goes by who operates the vehicle. If no TT or Sub-TT exists they will give it to nation of origin.
There are some pity bones like F-111C (given bc 111K was cancelled and there is only 1 foreign operator)
That is true. But that was more an exception. But certain other individuals won’t think that.
1 Like
Looks at Swiss Hunter in Germany (the Swiss aren’t sub-trees)
IRIAF reference
It means the F-14 is the first and unfortunately probably only US rank 8 aircraft to not be put into another tree
That would fall into the same category as the F-111C. As stated by the CMs before.