Yep, for air it can easily fill the two remaining lines… actually even there it’s almost cramped because India has 3 lines worth of planes
TBF its not a historically accurate Finnish Hornet and is entirely fake.
It uses the early 2000’s cockpit from when JHMCS was added to all production model Legacy Hornets while using Aim 9L, a missile Finland never used. It is a minor thing but to call it accurate is still technically wrong. I feel the reason they went pre MLU 1 is because MLU 1 and 2 have unique huds and changes as Patria were the ones to update the 90’s era cockpits to a modern standard. Its far more likely gaijin had no interest to put that much effort into it when they could simply move to MLU 2 essentially an equivalent F-18C to the current model just an update later. MLU 1 is more than likely planned to be sold as a premium if i had to guess. MLU 2 currently unless 9X is added fails to follow gaijins rule for major differences as stated why they denied the Gripen C. Fox 3 being the only difference between the C and A on launch. (Referring to swedish Gripen C) as it stands right now Sweden has been the weakest air nation in terms of vehicles and actually playing to the Meta. For me i don’t care id like to see them actually be worth playing but i have literally any other nation to play and actually have fun but this logic applies to most nations every other update.
My biggest gripe isnt that the Finnish Hornet is just worthless in its current implementation to the TT. (Though it does annoy me) rather its the fact gaijin are actively skipping the first uniquely Finnish modernization of the Hornet which when it comes to trees getting copy and paste and useful additions if i could choose between a vehicle that fills a role and is unique and historically important im gonna choose the best model i can. This would be like asking for a new tank for a TT and choosing the worst model because you didn’t want the better nodel. Its a poor decision and Smins response to add this differences is completely redundant given that MLU 1 is even more unique than a 1994 export Hornet.
not sure we should be counting Luxembourg anyways
what happened?
OSA, clovis, and the AMD got added to multiple nations after the community begged to get a vehicle they used.
Basically this means nations could ask for any vehicle their country developed.
Chally 3 to Germany, Begleitpanzer to sweden, ect ect stuff thats probably gonna cause a riot when it starts to get out of hand.
Would love to see a push for more Dutch equipment in the sub tree.
1 Like
Future potential trees or sub trees are always under consideration, but we dont have any news to report at this moment on those in particular no.
2 Likes
Any plans to fix the lack of any aircraft at 5.x sweden?
Additionally with the R2Y2’s leaving us should we expect the Ho Ri’s to eventually leave when Thai ground is added? (If you haven’t gotten them yet id grab them, Ho Ri is insanely fun)
A sub tree doesn’t necessarily mean a whole line is required. It just means those vehicles will be present in that particular nation. The vehicles can go anywhere inside of the existing 5 lines (if its a nation that has 5 lines).
CLOVIS was planned from the get go for both France and Germany. OSA was a longer term plan for the UK, with the Indian skin already made, just brought forward following feedback.
AMD 35 Pak was too reconsidered given the feedback we received on it and that it was after all, a German modification too.
None of these vehicles are however event vehicles. Which the Class 3P is.
i understood that but the question is, is it technically viable that we can see a dedicated subtree line in the futre?
Any chance other nations can still get the 2S1? Germany was skipped when it was added despite them using the vehicle
We are always working to gap fill where possible, however as you would know, we don’t announce specific plans outside of blogs and major news.
Given Britian has all 5 lines occupied currently, not for now no.
Tbf its been years and the problem has been actively avoided to say the least. Any info is appreciated when it hasn’t even been mentioned by the devs.
a small hopium for india subtree updoot
1 Like
A fair enough differentiation, Bismarck will have to be suggested separately.
Now iam drolling over some aircraft i saw there
Wellington with 40mm Turret XD
A very possible WW II AC130 for Britain to add if it gets AP belts
6 Likes
Which, in practice, would still mean mostly F-35s flying about as most of the nations in WT are in NATO/US allies and buy US kit.
Turkey and Korea aren’t even in game yet, and Korea operates F-35s as well.
The only nations that would really have anything unique are the US, Russia, and China.
1 Like
It’s an interesting definition.
But it could be misinterpreted if we consider some examples present in the game. You know.
2 Likes