Yes because the FM was broken beyond belief, i could flip upside and take off, very realistic. Given how many nerfs its received how is it any different than a F16A if given the same missiles and just internal CM’s without HMD?
Ill dm you with it when i find it, i hate the new bug reporting forum design lol.
@Smin1080p_WT
I know, that you know, this gap will be filled with something.
And i know, that you know, which vehicles that are going to be, should we be hyped?
BTW, how are you doing, long time no see.
1 Like
2 Likes
I believe its safe to assume a plane will fill that gap, as to what it is, idk
nvm it was pesa you’re right, still different from aesa tho
17 kills only for 7rp nice
yeah, i really felt accomplished… (not)
Naval rewards continue to be miserable…
Even with Premium account, Talisman and Boosters, I get 10,000 RP per 30 minute match at the top of the scoreboard.
The mode just is not worth it solely because of this.
Gaijin addressed and solved many issues, but this one still remains. I am glad they added capable bots, and that bots now give player-level rewards; the issue is that player-level rewards were already low on the first place. Former bot rewards were just inexistent at all.
That’s actually a really cool idea, although do you mean Squad as in like squads from Enlisted with bots, is it just a generic title, or does it mean multiple respawns makes up one “squad”?
Well i guess another good point of context is would the Squads be purely ai/bots or would it be FPS?
Personally I don’t feel like Ai/Bot squads from Enlisted would be a good idea if you mean FPS, just too much going on.
In my opinion, fighter aircraft for late production better early production
For example F-15C, F-15E, F4D-1 Skyray, F9F-6 Cougar, F7U-3 Cutlass, F/A-18C/D and F/A-18E/F.
The Typhoon FGR.4 from great britain tech tree post project centurion and already fired MBDA Meteor
But gajin might not ready Meteor until 2030 or 5 years
Place to 2nd line ?
JHMCS has been around for a while. On super hornets in 2000 and probably on legacy hornets before that
No, as it has JHMCS which was only on production model hornets in 2002. Super hornets were officially equipped in 2003 legacy hornets before 2000 have no confirmed use of the JHMCS so lets not try to claim that the US hornet is a late 90’s model.
If you’re gonna lie and claim that JHMCS was on US hornets in the 90’s at least actually learn when vehicles like the F16 and F15 first used JHMCS since they only began testing with JHMCS in 2000, F-18 only began testing after JHMCS proved to be useful to the F16 and F15 after successful integration tests.
JHMCS was a mid 90’s creation but it wasn’t on any mainstream US 4th gens before 2000 when they were tested to see how they would perform and if integration was possible.
Maybe not 90’s yes. But super hornet tested in 2000 and since this says it that D and F hornet/super hornets are both getting JHMCS for rear seats, there could be commonality between the 2 for HMD.
Again 2000, not late 90’s, don’t try to say it was a 90’s hornet especially when these are tests not production vehicles. What you’re doing is choosing specific information so that the US F/A-18C late doesn’t seem that new. Its you blatantly lying to try and underplay its age and what it does is discredit you when people call you out on it.
Yeah you are right about it being 2000 at earliest for the F/A-18C JHMCS.
I already said it too
See i know it cant be the 90’s because it was only in the early 2000’s that C models got the updated cockpit to have the HMD button on the console. Something that Gaijin who apparently always planned to be a mid 90’s F-18C got wrong as it has the mid 2000’s cockpit with the HMD dial because it was probably planned to be on par with the US before being changed. If accuracy was such a focus it wouldn’t have a cockpit it never used since MLU 1 has a unique cockpit from Patria.
@Smin1080p_WT considering our prior discussion why was the Finnish F-18 given the mid 2000’s US cockpit if the Fins only got the 1994 model? Also why do they have aim 9L despite not having it IRL? Any explanation for these historical inaccuracies would be appreciated so that it can be made actually historically accurate.
Finnish F-18 shouldn’t have a dial for turning HMD on and off if it was only added to US hornets in the 2000’s seems like the swedish air tree was again another last minute thought.
1 Like
By the way, thanks for arguing. I was looking for stuff to see if there was any earlier hornet HMD testing and I found something that might be able to go on F-15A (Agile Eye HMD)
I just have to figure out if it was an F-15A and not a C, since the tests were in 1986
Yes other HMD’s have been tested by the US. The phantoms have quite a few dozen different HMD systems that were integrated.
1 Like