Nothing 10.3 up matches its designation lol
I think the first one to do so in a while is the finnish hornet
Sweden doesnt use them?
They gave the SAAF Gripen AGM 65G on launch when the HUN gripen was added but then took 2 weeks adding them to the swedish model. Lets not say britain wasn’t treated the same.
Yeah, but why give the Hungarian one 65Hs when the other Gripens at the same BR don’t get access to them? Like, there’s no trade-off, one version is just a straight upgrade over another at the same BR
Heres your proof they weren’t there on launch because sweden air is always given last minute thoughts then actively ignored.
1 Like
Fair, just wanted to add that Gaijin apparently had to one-up themselves by adding another Gripen C with yet another upgrade over the existing Gripens at the same BR
Sweden has never had the best Gripen for CAS, SAAF Gripen had AGM65B and sweden with AGM 65A and when the SAAF got AGM65G which has a thermal seeker and HE warhead sweden was added a AGM65A with an HE warhead because thats good enough.
Again gaijin has made it more than apparent they hate sweden air, consistently we have to fight for the vehicle to be viable and a lot of the time we dont get a good change the only recent time we alone got something was when they locked the Di behind a paywall and tried to say the JA37D shouldn’t get RB99’s despite being created with that as its main purpose.
Even the Finnish F-18 gets to be held back because adding the same vehicle with a new IFF and HMD would devalue the US model. Its a joke and gaijin just consistently telling us to wait until a future update to have a equivalent vehicle is mind numbing. Both Germany and sweden consistently get this treatment for air and its a joke.
2 Likes
idk complain to the FMV about it?
It should only really get what it had
If balance was a concern from the Devs then the CAS line for sweden wouldnt have consisted of the worst version of the maverick for about 2 years
Thats not true, it is a B in game with the Sap-He warhead
Was it changed to a B, cause it was originally an A with a SAP warhead.
Generally no. Not every aircraft has a suitable alternative.
1 Like
To my knowledge its aways been a B in game, its not historic to my knowledge but there was mentions of an upgraded seeker and maybe gaijin has more on it than I do
Regardless its a moot point since RB75T was only added when AGM 65G was added and only for the Gripen. How many months did it take for the AJ’s to get RB75T?
It has the same seeker as a AGM 65A when it was first added it would often head straight for the target and in the last second go in a random direction and miss.
There was never a goal to “screw over Sweden”. The changes were made clear during the dev server. The goal was to provide both Britian and Sweden a competitive new jet. Something they both equally needed and something they both ultimately received.
I would recommend toning things down a bit.
1 Like
Is it possible to suggest a name change on already existing aircraft that fit the bill better and is better for the game in the long term with more being added?
The idea being both Swedish gripens be the A, just one is the A early/late therefore making it more accurate by designation and better for the dev team to add more in the future
So why add the Gripen A in a late 2012 config when you could’ve added it in a mid 90’s config and had sweden a actual competitive and historical gripen A? Also why does gaijin actively avoid adding a correct MS to the Gripens why have a bunch of fake Frankenstein Gripens that have never existed?
The B does that as well
If it can be supported by documentation / sources of some kind, sure. However some may be a game convention (for example if multiple variants of the same specific sub type are not planned).