The fact is interwar vehicles are played by practically everyone at one point (mainly because they’re forced to, that’s how progression goes).
They don’t deserve to have the zep in the TT.
They already enjoy a one sided event with the best tank and the best “bomber”.
Cool for them to never have access to it after.
I don’t understand why some people argue so much against something that they will never use and most likely will never even see it in battle while countless other players will enjoy it on their own
2 Likes
If that how progression goes then it shouldn’t be harmful to add unique things like WW1 since it would naturally be part of the progression
4 Likes
This is 100% the issue, when you bring up you like X era(usually WW2 or older) and want stuff from them, instead of another MBT or modern Jet, in the TT rather than unattainable(BP/Events)
1 Like
Bugged collisions? It has NO collisions.
It also doesn’t sink after being punctured by a storm of lead, it lacks a destruction model and proper destruction effects and I am pretty sure the flight model isn’t right either
And also don’t forget to add every vehicle variant instead of having them be a modifications so they have to grind T-72, T-72S, T-72M T-72A, T-72M1, T-72A (1984) etc etc
2 Likes
As I’ve said yesterday, WW1 hasn’t really got a place in WT currently (as a dedicated part of the TT). Having a couple meme vehicles is alright (to some extent), but asking Gaijin to compromise is a stretch. We would need a major rework for it to work.
1 Like
That’s how zeppelins work
Until incendiary ammo came into play they were just bullet sponges
Yeah also the many T-80 variants I guess it time to remove some I guess
2 Likes
Mate, they would sink after a certain amount of holes were punched in the hull. The hydrogen will escape over time.
1 Like
Over time
A very long time
Not to mention that they were self sealing
And in addition, it would need multiple sections to be completely destroyed and emptied to sink
Without repair parties patching the holes
Ah yes, the X and Y don’t have a place in WT(bad argument number 55)
Last I checked, according to the WT community, the F/A-18 didn’t have a place in WT and had no point in being added to the game, and I’m sure we can find more examples, but now they’re here and have a place.
3 Likes
I don’t know if it’s appropiate to make Mark V and Saint-Chamond tanks face BT-5s and Pz.IIIs.
I said WW1 doesn’t have a place in game currently, which doesn’t leave it out of the equation as long as the necessary reworks take place.
1 Like
Me when Rule 55 shows up
4 Likes
Meanwhile I get a kill via the Mark V against the Pz.III lol
3 Likes
Good for you. Would you like to force a new player to try the same?
1 Like
6 Likes
New players ?
Aren’t new players spending 60 quid on top tier premiums lol
1 Like
Also @Unit_8 Just because you don’t want it to come, it doesn’t mean that the vast majority of the playerbase (insanely rare occurance) shares the same opinion as you
( Making the Zeppelin a reward in the WW1 mode event [WITH POLL] )