But why constantly insist on adding a vehicle that will barely be played? It’s like the M2A2 or the FCM.36, they’re meme vehicles, yes, but mostly useless and not seen as interesting by most part of the community.
It’d be a waste.
1 Like
TB-3M when the Zeppelin is added to regular battles
4 Likes
I’ve really only seen about 5 players asking for the same thing over and over again, even when their posts have been closed and questions answered, I don’t see how that is “most players”.
2 Likes
Waste of what?
It already is a fully modeled vehicle available for anyone to play in an event
All it would take is to drag and drop it into a tech-tree
1 Like
That’s can be said with all vehicles “why play interwar where Vietnam era is more popular” ?
2 Likes
Waste of time.
It isn’t fully modelled
Last I played it was, other than the bugged collisions
The fact is interwar vehicles are played by practically everyone at one point (mainly because they’re forced to, that’s how progression goes).
They don’t deserve to have the zep in the TT.
They already enjoy a one sided event with the best tank and the best “bomber”.
Cool for them to never have access to it after.
I don’t understand why some people argue so much against something that they will never use and most likely will never even see it in battle while countless other players will enjoy it on their own
2 Likes
If that how progression goes then it shouldn’t be harmful to add unique things like WW1 since it would naturally be part of the progression
4 Likes
This is 100% the issue, when you bring up you like X era(usually WW2 or older) and want stuff from them, instead of another MBT or modern Jet, in the TT rather than unattainable(BP/Events)
1 Like
Bugged collisions? It has NO collisions.
It also doesn’t sink after being punctured by a storm of lead, it lacks a destruction model and proper destruction effects and I am pretty sure the flight model isn’t right either
And also don’t forget to add every vehicle variant instead of having them be a modifications so they have to grind T-72, T-72S, T-72M T-72A, T-72M1, T-72A (1984) etc etc
2 Likes
As I’ve said yesterday, WW1 hasn’t really got a place in WT currently (as a dedicated part of the TT). Having a couple meme vehicles is alright (to some extent), but asking Gaijin to compromise is a stretch. We would need a major rework for it to work.
1 Like
That’s how zeppelins work
Until incendiary ammo came into play they were just bullet sponges
Yeah also the many T-80 variants I guess it time to remove some I guess
2 Likes
Mate, they would sink after a certain amount of holes were punched in the hull. The hydrogen will escape over time.
1 Like
Over time
A very long time
Not to mention that they were self sealing
And in addition, it would need multiple sections to be completely destroyed and emptied to sink
Without repair parties patching the holes