An inf TT from WW1 to modern would invalidate their other game and possibly soon to be games.
I doubt they would cut off that possible revenue.
1 Like
I think it will be very different from enlisted but we will have to wait and see. I don’t think validate any game not even enlisted because in worth under you would still have so many more vehicles that are being played and are capturing points
Also enlisted has you unlocking weapons with squads but I feel like this infantry thing could be more like you unlock the unit and you get an ability/capability with the unit
A man can hope
1 Like
war thunder have a bigger player base than enlisted and also its not the same adding modern infantry to war thunder when you have a lot of modern things yet than adding modern infantry to enlisted when you have nothing modern in enlisted as a base to start its the cuadruple of work and money for they to work on that for enlisted, enlisted just gonna be always a dedicated WW2 game and nothing more. war thunder have a lot of potential to compete with games like ARMA III, ARMA REFORGER, SQUAD and Insurgency sandstorm because war thunder have practically all the only major thing that is lacking is the infantry and you will have a 100 times better game and more complete one compared to the ones i mentioned. for the rest of companies that are involved in the games i mentioned this is a kick in the balls just saying.
This was 5 years ago, no new game appeared.
They usually say stuff like that as part of the april fools joke.
Again, you really think Gaijin is going to give up their ability to market a significant age audience that also happens to be very susceptible to said marketing?
I doubt it.
6 Likes
Well that and I think that had a poor reception. So they axed it.
2 Likes
I honestly feel you aren’t being serious. But part of me still can’t tell.
tbh I like the idea of infantry, mainly because it will give more roles and life to IFVs and tanks in general, allowing you to deploy troops, cover them, or demolish fortified positions like buildings, even use the artillery we already have in game, there’s plenty of possibilities (in a separate game mode ofc)
what it makes you think am not serious?
Yeah it was a fun temporary gamemode, but even if Gaijin had plans for it as a seperate game I don’t think it would have performed well.
Regarding the infantry though, I think Gaijin enjoys the benefits of the PEGI 12 rating way too much for them to change that by adding infantry.
I think the only way we see infantry is in yet another seperate game.
1 Like
Not sure the videos popping up are from Enlisted or am I being April Fooled
I just hope there is WW1 infantry and we get M97/Model 1897
Slam fire bayonet 12 gauge
1 Like
you were saying … ?
Those are Germans (aka 00 buckshot magnets), not US troops
There’s lore??? (Insert game theory intro)
I meant the Saint-Chamond,
looking at you whilst you reload your birdshot
1 Like
If we’re talking WW1 guns, can’t forget a favourite of snipers(the common troop hated it for its issues)
Not an M1911 or M97 so invalid
Everyone knows .45 ACP can kill a tiger tank
2 Likes
^^You do realize Sub are confirmed to come to the game right…starting with WW2 Subs, as said in the Q&A from CM Discloser No.4
Same thinking pattern all the MBT naysayer had, look at War Thunder now! If War Thunders past is anything to go off…it’s looking more and more like the crazies are gonna be right AGAIN :D
2 Likes
or use the crane to push some rounds into the ol’ Sturmy boi
2 Likes