The T.10 is a premium. There is nothing wrong with a TT vehicle being basically the same.
About the engine, I absolutely believe that a 12.3 Harrier deserved to have the Mk 107. The GR.9 might be less special then, but they have other things they can do to make it a notable upgrade over the GR.7A.
seeing as we have a T.10 in the game filling this spot now, we dont need any others filing the same spot (or worse). In a perfect world i would love that, but Hawk T1.A and Gnat should be added next!!!
If the T.10 wasn’t a premium I would agree, but it sadly is a premium.
The Hawks and Gnats should come either way, but the Harriers have a special spot due to their ability to land and rearm at heli pads.
That’s a F-111A ish equivalent that would probably be about 9.7/10.0
Maybe? But given we already have the FRS1 as an SQV near that BR, it doesnt make sense. Maybe as an event vehicle, but I think there is a gap in the tree for it.
Yeah… Im on the fence whether we should be strapping ARH to another sub-sonic just for the sake of it. Kinda hope they restrict the Hawk’s loadout to keep them below 11.3 ish for a good long while and then maybe explore adding one with C5s and ASRAAM
9.0 version with no missiles but 30mm gun (Hawk T.1A early)
10.7 version with 2 aim9L and 30mm gun (amx counterpart) (Hawk T.1A Late)
13.0 version with ASRAAM (Hawk T.2)
13.0 single seat with Aim120 and radar (Hawk 200)
Gnat at 9.0 with just guns
Hawk T1/100 early at 9.7/10.0 with SRAAM
Hawk 100 at 10.7 with 9L
Hawk 200 at 11.3 with 9Ls and Skyflash
Hawk 200 (late) at 13.0+ with AMRAAM and ASRAAM.
i want too see ONLY that move down to 12.7 since its single advantage right now is its aim120, which it cant even use in BVR because its too slow. you replace the guns TOO to take them… truly the plane of all time
or they could decompress 13.0-14.0 → 13.0-14.7 and leave it as the only AHR at 13.0