clearly not real, some Model for children, and I feel familiar with this design, in game or movie, but I can’t remember.
Chinese Ratte?
1 Like
I do wonder, when Gaijin does a horrible job at recreating the camouflage, can it be bug reported on the community website ?
Example:
Naval secondary turret
guys the VT-1 missile is nerfed??
the Osa missile G pressure work MUCH better than VT-1 right now
what is going on
now i even cant kill a jet 5km away
1- You have to prove the settings of the photograph and prove post-processing hasn’t been done.
2- You have to prove both in-game and the real-life photograph are the same lighting.
The best way to prove things is to get official documentation to give a color code, and the color code is then used in computer software.
If there is sufficient evidence (more than just a single or couple of images to compare) to show a camouflage is incorrect in some way, it can be reported yes.
I think this is a edited picture. Even the shadows look green
1 Like
ahh all the things Gaijin did not have to do. Whilst they made up literally fake camouflages for the Zrínyi I(No.40) and the ww2 Hungarian tanks(Kubinka repaints), calling them historical.
Got to love this double standard from them.
(had to edit it cause somehow it was offensive to someone. But kind stranger u are welcome to prove the historical validity of the non-Hungarian(kubinka)/ fake camouflages(No.40) and the non-existence of double standards by words instead of abusing community reports)
what in the sandbox is that
ZSU-57 on steroids
@Gaijin This must come to the TT!!! Everyone needs to be able to enjoy the twin-barreled Chinese SPH!!!
Is this the new machine, the Su-2.7?
1 Like
Seems to be a water cannon for firefighting lol, or sci fi mockup
And how often do you see TO-55s actually getting a kill with their flamethrower? Plus i dont think water works on napalm
1 Like
Indeed
IDK, seem to me like not that VT-1 works bad but OSA overperforms.
1 Like