Yeah, im of the same opinion. But we never know what willl happen. Im guessing the US will demand the F-22 like hell when Typhoon is added
In fairness I’m not entirely sure there is anything else they can have. We know EFT is most likely superior in a large quantity of regards (radar, manouevrability, power, weapons, it starts to become hard to see where the EFT isn’t superior), but it would seem American doctrine shifted to low visibility aircraft such as the F-22. They just didn’t buy into the 4.5 Gen fighter idea (unless you consider the various upgrades the F-16 has had to be competitive) and went to stealth.
They’ll just have heavy SPAMRAAM aircraft. Like later F-15 Variants. Like how Britain was forced to stick to hit and run or attempt BVR combat in the Tornado F3 vs F-16s They’ll be forced to do the same in F-15s vs Typhoon.
2 Likes
I mean it also isn’t even sure Germany will be getting a sub tree/nation, but that doesn’t stop people from speculating.
Well, it depends on the bug report.
If it leads to a nerf, it is fixed immediately.
If it leads to a buff… good luck.
1 Like
Casually ignoring that the US received their first event Merkava 3 years before the israeli tree was released and they were in a far worse state for most of those 3 years.
Then clearly the red China flag should be changed to the KMT flag in the nations tab
Yeah… thats true. Still surprised the Mig-23s got nerfed
Everything should be tied to the US if it was up to you.
1 Like
Clearly people need to read history more instead of making stuff up about gaijin statements
2 Likes
Unfortunately the PRC “won” the civil war and gets pissy if you use the ROC at all.
And Gaijin wants that sweet Chinese money.
5 Likes
Of course I missed the sub tree debates again :p
Then again im sure you all know my stance on SK by now
3 Likes
Yea Woe thought ROC/Taiwan was a sub despite gaijin making no claim on that.
4 Likes
Sub-TT for Russia because of North Korea :P
1 Like
If they want Chinese money, then they wouldve not made Chinese vehicles horrendus. China is literally one of the most woefully represented tree alongside with Britain and Israel.
Just look at the MLU. It arrived in Taiwan with AMRAAMs, mikes, Sniper-XR and paveways. None of these were realized and the airframe was even un-MLU-d by nerfing 30 flares.
J-11A has one datalink, making ARH multitarget gameplay effectively limited to pitbull launches, as if the R-77 has any long range potentials. This is also the OCU variant which should be PL-12 ready.
The ZSL92 lacks an APDS and it received AP-T which it never had. It was even roled into an SPAA to make sure people cant scout with it.
The VT4A1 was effectively a joke with how poorly armored it is, and how the ERAs were grouped in huge numbers.
The ZTZ99A and WZ has been modelled in a very wrong way. Its mantlet is empty and its LFP is effectively 33% larger.
The ZBD04A lacks a 750mm tandem ATGM - it should effectively be a copy of the 9M117 as China did purchase it.
The TOR-M1 is yet to recieve domestic Chinese missiles, and they were stuck with the Russian ones. Because Russia does not have a tor in its tree, its performance was kept subpar.
People has pointed out even on this forum that there are ongoing beliefs that gaijin handicaps China in every way possible. After all, one need a weak ally to look stronger, standing against a strong nato.
4 Likes
That’s because it’s an event vehicle, a tiny % of the US player base would even have it, so way less would bother trying to get it fixed.
Not unique to China.
2 Likes
It does not matter do people consider Taiwan as a state or not, politics is beside the point.
Chinese tree should be exclusively made up with Chinese designs, were a gap to really exist, it must be filled with vehicles that China imported.
Vehicles of other nations in the tree as premiums should also be strictly China-designed. The Chinese TT could and should be Chinese, not mixing in other nations.
1 Like
Also to Britain and Israel, Britain arguably suffering the most.
I main all three.
Japan as well.