yeah the A and B were actually similar to the 7M with a slightly worse range if I remember right hence the russia doesnt need the R77
Sure, but that’s your opinion, and lets be honest, right now is there any need for a 6th line? People are mad because they’re taking the denial of a 6th line as a denial of xyz line or subtree they want. Gaijin isn’t currently adding xyz line so they don’t see any urgent need for a sixth line, ergo why would they try an workshop a solution for the density of the tech trees?
Just like there is different iterations of the aim9M, we don’t have the most advanced 9M in the game
It’s pretty despicable that high tier premiums cost anything more than low tier premiums. Do they take more time to develop? I doubt it.
So what’s the justification?
ah yes, then americans would have a f&f missile while russia has to keep lock, good balance my dude
2 Likes
Oh sh**&
at least im not a real main of any nation :3
huh interesting
I’m coping so hard for a J10A
1 Like
Almost like the 27ER and ET where added entirely too early huh
ngl same
didn’t see it
ugly fins that must be our AMRAAM
1 Like
I guess you taken a look at mine : D
the thing is they have used that as an excuse to not add such lines, such as the british light tank line being denied due to us having the SA line
3 Likes
like their massive navy. that will be huge. such a huge air tree they skip half the tiers then you just get a tank tree which is made primarily of megachs, centurions and merkavas
1 Like
tbh I wouldn’t be that bad just notch it smh
yes yes, you seem to be similarly far in what 4 nations?
always getting bored halfway through?
literally not true both a and b were miles better than 7m and being able to instantly notch after firing is also a great adventage R-77 is upto 80km with the best possible launch conditions aka will never reach the range in game so. Aim120a/b is comperable to R-77