Gaijin just doesnt want to make arietes good or at least playable, the premium is then a centauro so no wallet warriors will complain )))
1 Like
where can i find the list please
You and someone else have said this. Name the patches please, any of them. I must have been sick those patches and couldn’t come in since I can’t remember any of them.
The problem is the same as always, the AMX10P is an ifv, but given that the game has a horrible penetration calculator, both the APCR and the APDS pierce at least 10mm less than they should, apart from losing penetration too quickly at a distance, So in the end they add this type of tank as SPAA. Maybe one day they will finally improve the penetration of the 20mm cannon and change both the AMX10P and the Wiesel from SPAA to a light tank.
I doubt you know Russian or that your translator is good, because under turrets texts literally says that it’s not T-80U and T-80UD turrets, but two turret variants for T-80UD, and as I have posted before, the latter one with metal-ceramic package wasnt adopted, as they simply didnt manage to shift production to better steel and better armour packages in time before the collapse.
Again, you cant really say that because this is image showcasing UFP of 219M compared to 478B (T-80UD one), not 219AS (T-80U) to 478B (T-80UD)
Both turrets on images you posted previously are welded.
Here is scheme of the cast turret for export T-80UD, made for Pakistan
The “high quility” would probably be exported T-80UD, but they re not soviet. Plus I doubt they re superior by anything but the turret armour.
T-84 would be superiour to T-80UD, being obvious continuation of it.
3 Likes
Oh and to finish this:
T-80UD was developed of the T-80U as both were being developed at the same time, starting from 1976 with Object 219A and Object 478, developing into 1984 Object 219A and Object 478B, being adopted in 1985 and 1986(7?) as T-80U (Object 219AS (S - being serial)) and T-80UD (Object 478) accordingly.
T-80UD by itself was replacing engine deck of T-80U with diesel enginw and different transmission to make more fuel effecient engine and make it a bit bit easier for production lines.
It also had different things mount differently from T-80U, and in fation of Kharkiv’s plant commander’s hatch with MG you can control from inside.
Improvement for transmission and APU (T-80U had better one and had gasturbine APU in back)
First was finished after collapse and saw use in T-84 series of tanks, as well as few modernisations, I don’t know about the APU part.
T-80U means T-80 tank “Improved” (“Улучшенный”)
T-80UD means T-80 tank “Improved” “Diesel” (" Улучшенный", “Дизель”)
4 Likes
Man…don’t get my hopes up for Fox 3’s…just stop people 😑 that way if they do show up 🤯🥳
There are 2 E’s. One is pre production with old type wing and the other production one with bigger wing. Production variant could get meteors instead of making E variant a single vehicle.
2 Likes
It’s either so controversial like the AJ (cough F-2) or something so tame that you would think it’s already in the game already (some prop or PT boat barely anyone cares about).
I don’t get why 6 vs 8 ARHs is a big deal for you. We had a bigger leap from AIM-9Ls to AIM-9Ms.
We’ll most likely see F-15C MSIP with ARHs in June alone with Gripen Cs with ARHs, etc. They’re also less likely to slap ARHs on F-16C as that’d move the BR up again and create BR gaps (a point that keeps being brought up against Japan).
2 Likes
Yeah thats what I meant by the NG. NG is the pre-prod afaik.
Hopefully, plus I’d get to grind BRs/Vehicles I enjoyed again. On top of making lines up correct line up without tree hoping.
1 Like
NG is a marketing name for customisable platform based on JAS39E/F. NG as specific variant doesn’t exist, the same way as Leopard 2A7+ doesn’t exist as one. It all comes to having a general platform customized/modified for customer’s needs.
1 Like
Its interesting that the Gripen E pre-prod to Gripen E is very remiscent of change from Eurofighter without AMK to one with AMK.
I think Tarasenko is also just generally a Morozov fan.
The issue is my interpretation of the sentences, not the translator.
I thought somewhat that the ceramic-metal package was responsible for the increased protection by 70mm or so.
I am somewhat under the impression UD is marginally more protected than U for reasons of Morozov factory doing things a little differently than Omsk or Kirov.
In any case we will see what abomination is brought forth by Gaijin, probably some hybrid like the T-80BV we see. I’m still hoping for T-80UE-1 as a premium in the patch after this.
1 Like
And the two center pylons can carry bombs, which have been acknowledged.
1 Like
Facts
yeah but that’s minor
1 Like
Still means britain and possibly italy will keep the best version of the aircraft for yet another update. Personally would have rather gotten the atlas cheetah for my british lineup but looks like i get another reason to not bother playing sweden for the gripen.
He is, he was also responsible for showing that one tank that Object 292 was going to be.
Then T-80U would have 70Mm protection less judging the tabs, but it has same as T-80UD by pictures posted previously.
They have done things together a lot, took one from other, armour packages arent something that is done by plant, but done by armour bureuo, cant remember the name but they are responsible for all of T-series armour, exception being T-84 (since the bureuo is still at russian territory.)
Highly doubt it fits 11.3 and we dont have 11.7 tank premiums, so unlikely if it comes soon it will be premium.
1 Like