Anyway, I am sure that the Canadian leopard 2a4m will definitely go to Germany since the C2A1 which is the Canadian leopard 1 is in Germany as an event vehicle
Interesting, some guy on our forum discuss about the hull, they stated that “the image” might be the hull of T-80UD and the Nozh layer gonna be added and that gonna be the T-84 hull,
The only boat devblogs we usually get are for the US, Ru and GB.
We don’t really get boat-blegs for JP, IT and DE.
waiting for su25sm3 blog to drop
mann i cant wait, best su25 and we finally get to see it
2 Likes
So that would bebthe Su25 better than Su39 they talked about?
Perhaps with BVR missiles?
Mitsubishi T-1, T-2 strike aircraft. 🙏🏻
1 Like
Vast majority of T-80UD’s are using a Soviet T-80U layout, and it’s not until later with the T-84 that we see such changes. I know for a fact the T-84 Oplot M uses the modified hull armor to fit ERA in, but I’m not even sure if early T-84’s use this armor layout or not.
Regardless, my assumption about the T-80UD is that it’s a more simple basic version for the Soviet Union, so expect a T-80U with T-90A levels of mobility
2 Likes
its the best to an extent, it has gen 3 thermals(apparently) thats about it i think idk
it doesnt get r77 or r27 like the su39(TM), but it has the ability to guide r27 or r77 launched from different platforms(also apparently)
1 Like
If we get a G10N1 fugaku dev-blog… Then i will lose my mind. 🤪
2 Likes
and i just found out putting TM in parenthesis makes the trademark symbol
But nO pApEr PlAnEs fOr jApAN
Lol, would be nice tho
have you played top tier GB lately? its 95% full of clouds… CAS without thermals are deeply impacted by this, so yes, russian tree needs a thermal CAS plane.
1 Like
might be or might not idk cuz its still an aim 120c
Bruh, talk about T-90A, it annoy me about Gaijin butchered it to fit the gap between T-72B/64B/80B and Top tier.
T-80UE-1 with the same FCS from T-90A spin the turret like a pinwheel and in game (T-90A) it just the T-72B with thermal.
No one has paper boats, and boats aren’t aircraft.
So that’s both an incorrect post and a false equivalence fallacy.
Kikka is already an example of production armament on aircraft, and people complain about Yak-141 when Kikka did it first as a fully built prototype without guns installed IRL.
"After the collapse of the USSR in Ukraine mastered the production of a new tower design with a base of rolled products. The tower is made of high steel armor steel hardness obtained by electroslag remelting ( ESP ). Steel with ESP provides an increase in stability in equals structures by 10-15% compared to rolled steel of medium hardness. So way the tower with the base of rolled products ( ESP ) has significant advantages in armor resistance compared to a tower with a cast base.
Service in the development of production the towers of the new design are largely owned by one of the oldest manufacturers armor steel, armored corps and tank towers - software « Azovmash ». Large-tonnage horizontal bars for heterogeneous armor, workpieces of large heterogeneous stamps, hard-to-profile workpieces poured by ESL for tank sides, tank towers were obtained from technological schemes that had no analogues in the practice of world engineering. Work in areas of creating new armored materials on an electroslak basis allowed work out design and technological solutions that are the basis production of T-80UD tanks with a welded tower."
I’ll have to read up on the hull, but it sounds like the new turret was a post 1991 thing, so I don’t think it will be on the original T-80UD.
“On reverse gear maximum: km / h 4.8”
Hate to poop in your cornflakes, it’s gonna be a dud. No way the extra armor helps with that. Allegedly the 6TD will make it zippier in the acceleration, but the reverse is still screwed.
Not sure what Gaijin is doing here tbh.
Mhm apparently they are closer, but those ranges are the standard range if you launch correctly from the correct altitude and speed
It would be interesting to see. Afaik, research on Nozh began during Soviet times and was shelved for Kontakt-5. Wouldn’t be the first time Ukraine took some old research and finished it, just look at the Drozd’s predecessor, which they developed into Zaslin.
In theory you can score kills with even Aim7Ms from high altitude at ranges of 25km so AMRAAMS will not be crazy its gonna be the same thing but harder to dodge and we could in theory launch more per minute than sparrows, but you still gotta wait for the missile’s radar to engage by itself @D4nger_CLO5E
I’m not sure about the lower tier one, however for the higher tier one, an early J-22 or the IAR-93 would fit.
2 Likes