Yeah, for gameplay reasons I can’t see IR seekers becoming too much of a problem, after all I think what we’re all most looking forward to with new IR missiles is the flight performance of them, obviously the better seeker will be nice too, but I for one don’t really care if it’s not 100% accurate, so long as it’s good enough I can get kills with it, but not so good I can’t defend against it, I’ll be happy.
I just want an IR missile that I don’t feel is a waste of wing space
Yes, I have. There is nothing supporting the addition of an ADATS to the Japanese tech tree, however there are plenty of factors supporting its addition to the British and American tech trees.
The same goes for the OSA in the German, Soviet, British and Italian tech trees.
So let me get this straight Japan has Thailiand as aa subtree which does have the adat but turrets and america which made it but never fileded it. But japan shouldnt get it cause of reasons
You should try using the logic for Ito for france oh wait. Its a french turret. Maybe if Thailand was the creator of the turret they could get it and it would be more reasonable then you screaming about it?