I mean, if people really want them to be seperated I won’t object to that lmao
Just thinking about how foldering one of them would make sense (3 variants of a plane that are mostly the same for regular gameplay) AND reduce the grind for people
I mean, if people really want them to be seperated I won’t object to that lmao
Just thinking about how foldering one of them would make sense (3 variants of a plane that are mostly the same for regular gameplay) AND reduce the grind for people
If any of them should be foldered, it should be the C, given that the B was the first to see service, and the C came around like 4 years later, but honestly splitting them 3 ways works fine, and given that there is nothing to come after them, Gaijin have said they don’t want to add folders to the final aircraft in a tree, so it would actually be weird if they did it here
Huh, didn’t know that they actually said that they don’t want folders at the end of a tree (guess that must be limited to planes as well, coz the Challenger 2BN/2E and the Type 10/TKX are foldered and at the end of the column).
No
yes its fake. It is from an aircraft suggestion post McDonnell Douglas F/A-18C Hornet: Continuing a Proud Tradition
just slap some kontact 5 on that turret ring and drivers hatch and that would be nice
An Abrams with even more dead weight era? No thanks.
I’d prefer an Abrams that would be a meaningful upgrade, so pretty much the SEPv3.
iz kontact 1 tho
Yes, so useless dead weight at 11.7.
turret ring is much less visible irl than in game
Well if a panzer 4 decides to fire HEAT at you, you know that you are 80% safe
everyone and their grandma has the muscle memory for shooting abrams at the turret ring reducing visibility won’t do anything
thats what im saying vro
Wat?
Besides that the Rafale M would literally be a Bugatti in War Thunder, the Rafale M has the worst flight performance out of all production Airframes, so yea…
They could add the Rafale M LF.1 as its quite unique but I don’t see a reason to add any other Rafale M.
The F/A-18E will have 12x AIM-120B/C and 2x AIM-9M/X right?
Unless everyone is getting better IR Missiles this update NO
Yes it cold mount them
Should have that missile count, but likely 120B/9M and not 120C/9X
missile count correct