To be fair. i would care at all if TT would end at different BR. Great examples are Ariete MBTs, they arent 11.3/11.7 MBTs materials, those should be lower BR.
Bombs not missiles
doesnt the PGM in game not act more like a missile
To be fair the PGMs are coded as AGMs in-game
seems more like an excuse then anything lol
Su-27SM devblog but no J-11 to go along with it ? Strange…
The devs themselves said it is classified as missile ingame from a report I had done. I’ll message you on discord.
China has got J-8F for FOX-3 after all
that’s beyond supbar at this point
Hell i’d rather the MLU get its AIM-120 than use a J-8 in the upcoming meta
2 Likes
You know what plane hides in 2A4M???
The A-4M!!!11!1!11!!!1
INSANITY
1 Like
Gotta love the good old excuse that the cashcows that are A-10s and Su-25s would struggle at a higher BR, meanwhile they are compressing the matchmaker all the way down to 7.3
IIRC Exocet loadouts have been in the game for some time, just not usable.
i was writing similar stuff but if you look at their updated sheet the jaguar will stay 10.3, at least except if i didn’t understood well.
Guh, I will take it. In theory in game right now the advantages of China is high-tier tech at a low BR, sacrificing other parts of potentials. Q-5L with the lowest BR for LGBs, WMA/PTL for gen2 thermals etc. If J-8F/H/IIM can continue this trend of low tier high-tech sure. But FFS make the current missiles SD-10 not PL-12. And get the PL-8A in - with the python 4, on that topic.
god cant wait for it
Nice idea, i’m in !
8 Likes
in game they would probably suck ngl
Will there be any more dev blogs today?
most likely no