Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

You know that TURMS-T is 4 years old, right? KVT was added as Rank 6 and US already had XM-1. So you can have lots of premiums at the same time.

Gaijin clearly don’t count 10.0-10.3 in the same bucket as 11.0-11.3

They should have made more vehicles. But broadly I agree, their time should come too.

BTW

image
image
image

1 Like

1 pack premium vs 2 pack premiums
hmmm

1 Like

i realy dont care about the turms, its raised to rank 7 now, just like so many other premiums

they do, best example is how sweden got a pre order 10.3 and not an 11.3 as well

the amount of pack premiums realy dont matter

It wouldnt surprise me with the most modern jets.

At which point, i’d advise people to spend their money on actually good games. That they can then also use the money left over to get them for their friends.

So about this esports drop skin thing. I am very excited for the legionaire skin since its exclusive to the AMI F-16. Problem is, that weekend I will be away in Manchester watching an offline event(blast r6 major).
What are some options to get that skin?
Yeah its a bit off topic but still.

at later points they get added to the esport skin loot boxes, so u can get it on the market place


Fascinating new insight gathered.

Experience can come in both quality and quantity. Imo quality of experience (playing vehicles well) is more valuable than quantity of experience (playing a lot of battles while barely going 1:1 or not even) is much more valuable.

1 Like

image
isnt the british adats missing from that chart lmao

I also agree that adats is worse than 11.7
🤣🤣🤣

It is tank destroyer

1 Like

I broadly agree.

Very dependent on the ability of the vehicle to permit quality play.

Inflexible vehicles lacking favourable characteristics (TURMS-T) have an inherent cap on what you can do, thats much lower than other, better vehicles.

1 Like

Skill can seriously close that gap though. That is why at top tier you see players in objectively worse tanks like Arietes and Merkavas keeping up with Strv 122s/2A7Vs and BVMs in performance.

Of course, but when those same players use a Type 10 or M1A2 SEPv2, they do much better than a rando in a 122B+.

With how hand held the Strv 122 is? I wouldn’t be 100% sure.

In particular when in a SEPv2. Where the Strv 122 can just overpressure you before you can even shoot back.

For whoever bothers but especially for @Shay

Test subjects:

Challenger Mk.2: 18deg/s vertical
2S25: 2.9deg/s vertical
Leopard 2AV: 38deg/s vertical
M60 AMBT: 8.3deg/s vertical

Cursor wasn’t moved in order to let the game do the adjusting of the gun elevation on its own to avoid skewing results, all I did was just drive the vehicle forward and backward, but just imagine being in a brawling situation behind buildings and the game is moving the gun on its own as you’re peeking in and out behind cover.

took a lot longer than the 10 min i said because youtube took forever to load it in HD, and now I shall go rest my head cuz my head hurts

3 Likes

To add on from this, it’s also why Type 10 and Type 90 at top tier actually kinda sucks because their gun elevation actively griefs the tank, despite having a superb 4s reload. Now imagine bad elevation speeds at higher speeds, it makes shooting on the move a lot harder as well.

1 Like

We’re almost close to the big update of the year

5 Likes

One of the two big ones