boxcer rct 120 trumps them all, oh i would love that one to be added
They have some bad history with the maintenance department. XD
But for AT stuff they should do great (90mm AT gun or 30mm apfsds with spikes), at least mobility-wise.
Idk if that was a Belgian initiative tho, probably just a turret that someone else bought
thats what you do this for isnt it. having to be right on the internet. im just talking about vehicles lmao
It is when something else domesticated could have taken its place, it’s lazy and it’s going to start upsetting people a lot more in the future. You just can’t see it yet
this is the most up to date photo of the tank we have got, no APS yet but it is supposedly in trials so could see it
Yeah… we were talking about Booker, not Boxer, not the same category ^^’
Then I recommend to look into the matter again, as there are IFV, AT and recoilless rifle carrying variants for the YP-408 and YPR-765 while the SIBMAS and Cockerill armed vehicles pack good armaments at all.
Emblematic of sharing wrongful info due to lack of research
like?, btw domesticated means that they tamed sth foreign. I think u meaned indigineous?
So exactly what i said…
A domestic vehicle is something build home for me.
It was a collaboration between ST Kinetics (Singaporean chassis) and Cockerill as a proposal for the MPF program. There was the American company SAIC involved but that was mostly token as they didn’t contribute much (if at all) to the vehicle. Though, SAIC and ST Kinetics (though mostly the latter) developed the chassis then approached Cockerill to jump onboard as the turret was already tried and tested. Which is why it would best suit the niche of an event vehicle @Hyrikul .
well im not exclusively talking about in service today, which is why i ignored that
the boxer i am talking about has an unmanned 120mm autoloaded cannon with spike launcher and APS system.
You shouldnt count that one as a boxer, its a light tank
this a quote from a news article released on April 18th by the british army so seemingly it does have its APS
Finally, take you decades to join the league of autoloader enjoyers.
again, i never said those dont exist. the thing i said in the very beginning is that theres not a lot of these, meaning its best to add them sparingly as to not run out of stuff to add too soon. for now we get the most meaningful ones, more can be added later
This convo just sums up the WT community. Taking other peoples ideas as there own, facts or misinformation and let it feed on their emotions.
I hate these stupid errors
Then we agree to disagree on the notion that it’s not a lot, cause I find there to be plenty