If those commercials claim hard numbers while the footage itself contradicts it then I also wouldn’t believe those.
But I guess playing the victim card is easier to do, just like russia irl.
Ahh yeah…the minor thing that people so easily forget about /s
1 Like
Do you see what I mean?
No i dont. At all. Myself i hate anything communist related and soviets fall under that
No! I didn’t want to start a political debate. Dont get the topic locked =)
The West is basically run by corporations, so everything needs to be sold.
Being anti-soviet is based. Just as being anti-US can be. The cold war has both of them doing questionable things.
But Russia is a different matter. I personally hate the T-14 because it’s full of propaganda. You’re statement that it’s the most advanced tank in existence is evidence of that. When it only really just meets Western standards.
2 Likes
I’m more toward the famous “FT-17” (wrong name commonly used) or Saint-Chamond tanks :p
Plus, can we keep politics out the forum please ?
1 Like
Because they are deceptive enough to claim nothing. Can’t be sued for false advertising if you don’t say anything.
How many on this forum play the “victim” card without reason?
I’m alluding to the obvious, the “red scare” never ended.
To get back on topic. What components do yu think Gaijin will add to tanks as the results from the latest polls from them?
It’s unfathomable to me that an informed person could arrive at that conclusion.
Haw anyone ever run numbers on how frequently and in what time frame the suggestions are added?
It doesnt matter if the community falls for western propaganda videos. They dont make the game. The developers regularly fall for russian propaganda videos.
1 Like
А так хорошо всё шло. Goodnight everybody, till devblog.
More detailled interiors, perhaps little engine or things like that.
Perhaps a Tea machine for Centurion and a Bakery on the back of French tanks too, with hard impact on crew moral if destroyed
1 Like
Plans for second update
6 Likes
Yeah I know. Hopefully soon.
Look at Russian spall liner reports vs. NATO spall liner reports.
Reminder that NATO invented spall liners way back in the 60s. Russia of course gets their first tank with a spall liner from the 2010s, but they simply refuse to believe NATO ever used spall liners.
1 Like
I think there is a sword modeled in one ship, but im not sure in which one
1 Like
Where dev blog?
Still hope more low/mid tier vehicles would be added then more top tier vehicles that they is so little know about and most of the stats are just made up
1 Like
Just from a quick search, here’s how WW1 tanks would work for ingame nations (Tanks that have actual cannons but granted, MGs can also work considering we have the M2A2):
US: Received loans of the French Renault FT (M1917) and a couple of British Mk. Vs for the end of WW1, alongside the American-British Mark VIII tank.
Germany: Sturmpanzer A7V (Most others were either MGs or captured French/British)
Russia: Couldn’t find much apart from the Tsar tank, but I’d have to do more research.
Britain: Mark V. / IV / I / etc. (all the variants)
Japan: Received 1 Mk. IV tank, 13 Renault FTs, and 6 Medium mark A Whippets (Mark IV was acquired in October 1918 while the others were 1919)
China: Renault FTs
Italy: FIAT 2000, Renault FTs.
France: Renault FTs, Char Saint-Chamond tanks, Char 2C (closest thing to a WW1 tank we have ingame)
Sweden: All I could find was Sweden purchasing parts for the German tank prototype LK II and then making the Strv m/21 (only had an MG however)
TLDR: French Renault FT battle royale
5 Likes