It is what it is tbh.
Oh right :D Im talking about the Minotaur-class light cruiser
sir i regrettably was comparing boats, not a clue
? No…
AAM-4 is just an AIM-120C equivalent missile at the end of the day.
AAM-4B adds a different radar.
Didn’t mean to respond to that lol
did u mean the WoWs format with 5x2 152mm Autoloaders?
And PL-12 is supposed to be an AIM-120C equivalent missile, look at how that turned out.
As far as i know Namer uses less powerful engine (something 1200hp iirc?).
If that is still the case then it will be par or slightly worse then Merkava 4.
Ah… Right yeah that thing. Would be funny.
Not sure what the rules are on paper ships when it comes to naval. I think there is more wiggle room that there is for tanks or air
which for me at least is plenty enough, scouting at a reasonable BR on a vehicle that is at the least somewhat useable? sign me up
paper ships are acceptable so long as a boat specific component was built, or it was laid down.
If these are the features and vehicles for the new patch, then the start of the devblog series was disappointing! for all the discussions in the last few weeks, just because the developers misjudged the effort?
Overall, the list of features and vehicles is quite short, so hopefully there will be something that really improves the game mechanics.
I’m tired of being riddled by Russian machine guns and the NATO vehicles don’t scratch Russian and Chinese-made super machines.
Slow start nobody seems to be really happy is my impression
Aye aye, get in then :D
yeah its the 1947 design of Minotaur and because her turrets were actually built she is technically in the clear for getting added (they were used for the Tiger class)
Which is kind of vague and opens up the door for actual nonsense like A-150.
Should submit a suggestion
ah. that’s a no then because the component has to be class specific. hence why we can’t have Montana class rn (sorry that’s me not being clear)
So like naval then :D
Leak list never show everything.