well anyway i’m of , have work early , have fun guys
4 Likes
is this true? :(
Im curious about myself
But I have a bad feeing at the result
Smin will need more than just coffee when he comes back >_>
19 Likes
Anyone asked ChatGPT when the first dev blog is going to be?
3 Likes
Cant blame us for going off topic when theres no topic to start ;)
7 Likes
I love this chart, every time I see it all I can think is Damn Strike Eagle is thiccc
Smin is not going to like our goon sesh
1 Like
At least we were having fun and getting along. :D
Rather then... You know,
Being at each others throats over something.
4 Likes
im stealing that
3 Likes
We should continue this ai chat in here from this point on : )
1 Like
That’s just your opinion lol (or you know something we don’t).
There’s little difference between 6 and 8, especially when there are talks of reducing player count anyway. If it really was an issue, they could limit the amount carried (so F-15 would only be allowed the body pylons and not the wing ones for AIM-120, for example). There is precedence for this already with planes like the A-10 and their AIM-9L.
They generally are incomplete and not 100% accurate, just mostly accurate.
1 Like
There is no precedent. A-10 has all of its pylons filled with AAMs.
And the premium is a premium, not a tech tree vehicle, it’s one plane.
They should never make arbitrary limits, never.
If you want that, go to custom battles.
The premium one does not and is limited to 2x AIM-9L for balance while the tech tree one carries 4x 9Ls.
Both should be able to carry 4x 9Ls. The funny part is, the pylon is there on the premium one, just empty.
They should make limits as it suits them for gameplay and balance. I’m sure people would rather have an F-15C MSIP with 4x 9Ms and 4x AIM-120s now than wait longer to get it with 8x AIM-120s.
1 Like
Whats stopping them from giving us a jet with 8+ ARHs? There isnt anything
In my opinion, nothing really. Gameplay wise it doesn’t matter much and is a negligible effect.
If anything you wouldn’t want to use all ARHs anyway because you’d want IR missiles for their IRCCM and agility. ARHs at close range are going to be slow and sluggish in comparison.
5 Likes
Yea they’ve done it before and they can do it again. Losing a few missiles just to get the aircraft in the game sooner is just fine. Same policy as bringing in aircraft with older missiles even though it could use the newer ones or even entered service with the newer ones.
3 Likes
On both its pylons.
Dual mount isn’t a pylon, but either way it’s a premium.
And no, there should be no limitations on F-15s. that’s anti-Japan/USA/Israel bias.