One has HE but not heat
one has heat but not HE
They are different and they are the only 10.3 mbt Sweden has
you can’t comapre to the CR3
One has HE but not heat
one has heat but not HE
They are different and they are the only 10.3 mbt Sweden has
you can’t comapre to the CR3
Belgium would imply German tanks too
The argument was that britain shouldn’t get the canadian 2A6 because it was not needed while Germany should get the swiss F-18.
Which is still the point from which I was arguing.
Keep in mind that I put it between quotation marks because I’m not sure if it’s really a flaw irl, it just becomes one in game.
Mostly what has already been said. Meh mobility, weak protection, meh survivability, limited firepower in game.
One is a tech demonstrator, the other is a prototype, different tanks.
But they are the same either way
Britain doesn’t need the Leo 2A6 though, they have the Challenger 3, there is no capability gap that needs to be filled. If you don’t want to play Challengers then go play a different tree.
No, different tanks.
leopard 1s yes, so? they dont define the top tier, besides that belgium implementation can always be focused on cockatril vehicles. Like i said, i dont necesarily have sth again other nations getting germany stuff, i just dont want other nations to lose their identitiy so to say
It’s kinda sad that while other nations can get things like the T-14, KF-51 and Abrams X; Britain is going to end stuck with a Glorified Chieftain 3 XDDDD
well britain has their 130mm challenger as well
Its pretty much the same as the current KF51
They are the same though in every way but how it was made
they are not comparable to a Leopard 2A5 to A6
Neither does Germany need the swiss F-18 in that case. The F-4F ICE and 29G can fill the gap until the Typhoon.
we will just take a trialed one, easy, dont need swiss, and no f4f ice and 29g dont fill the gap they create the gap
F-4F ICE is not comparable to 4th gen AMRAAM aircraft
The prototype has the extra armour on the UFP
I wouldn’t have a problem. They could also always limit it to the weaponry it was trialed with, like the Swedish T 80 U is limited to 3BM42.
If people tell the british players to just deal with having to play subpar vehicles, I will tell those people the same thing back.
Neither are the 11.7 CR2s comparable to most other 11.7s.
Which is why the Challenger 3 exists.
and where you get that info from huh
you are a brick wall and a hypocrite by the way I’m done talking as this is going no where
Which is barely better than the Challenger 2s lmao. Hardly closer to the other 11.7s.