You are an F18
If that was their reasoning than Germany and Sweden would have received their premiums last update
he said the same for uk doesn’t really mean much
5 Likes
u forgot Russia, while the T-90M isnt as strong as expected i would still say spicy
to sweden first /j
To be fair, the T90M is hot trash
1 Like
but still spicy, looks nice, still not sure how it apparently performs as bad as it apparently does
Isnt there a user model for this jet?
I think you mean
OP BIAS VEHICLE ONLY VEHICLE WITH SPALL LINER OP OP OP BIAS RUSSIAN BIAS
Somehow you forgot.
1 Like
It’s a pretty meh 11.7. Sure it’s not bad like the Leclercs, Merkava, Challengers and Arietes, but it’s seriously meh compared to most Leopards, Abramses and the BVM.
That’s different variant
2A4M CAN really looks cool, I would like to have it in Germany, I won’t deny it. Although on the other hand I feel sorry for the main Canadians.
What Gaijin does with CW vehicles in general seems like a disaster. I think it would have been better if they had their own TT CW.
The 2A4CAN would be the third CW vehicle that Germany receives. Maybe Germany could get the Turkish 2A4 or Singapore instead… idk.
2A4CHL does not have L/55, so it would not be an option. Its improvements have to do with communication equipment and optimizing the engine to operate in the desert at more than four thousand meters high (initial problems with sand and engine heating). Perhaps, the 2A4CHL with its (functional) thermal camouflage and M322 could be an interesting option in 11.3 (it would be better than merkava 3, which is 11.0).
2 Likes
Wasn’t that Super Hornet?
LERXs aren’t really visible, can’t tell
1 Like
Gaijin concluded in the future ground vehicle and aviation all rank from Australia & Canada might be part of the independent own tech tree (ANZAC) only huh ?
1 Like
-4 reverse and 7.1 second reload. That is everything it needs to be meh and to never really be good.
yeah not a thing, even the PSO should already have reduced thermal signature
Hmm interesting
But i mean didnt smin say we wouldn’t see it for a bit?