Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

I don’t know what’s wrong with Yamatos’ ammunition racks, but… yeah.

A weird balance choice is also how they have the least and largest buoyancy compartments in any Top Tier Battleship, so it’s easy to lose unsinkability too, as far as I’ve been told.

So… the ship class that required 9-17 torpedos to lose buoyancy and sink, sinks after a few regular shell hits xD

2 Likes

Costal has been that except is blue water boats rushing for Coastal spawns

Yamato was only hit by 7 torps, all on 1 side

They are nerfed as hell. They should have one of the tightest turning circles out of the top capital ships, she sinks too fast, too few compartments and their health is low. And of course the whole one shot issue

3 Likes

There is a difference between capsizing and a loss of Buoyancy

Also for Yamato specifically the ussualy agreed number is between 9 and 13

Dm63 would add nothing

The ship that took confirmed 11 torpedos and 6 bombs with her sistership having took estimated 19 torpedos and 17 bombs

Behemoths that thanks with some documents we know have one of the most complex and intricated survivability compartment systems that immediatly could self-sustain damage like almost no other can, treated like paper in game…

Yamato and Soyuz situation truly is a stone of shame of this game and his “historical decisions”…

6 Likes

Oh yeah its definitely a cool ship but we already have a ship of that class in the UK tree but still no R class which the russia tree has had for coming too 2 years now

Not as a Premium though >:C

I want it as a Premium to grind the British tree, hahah. I can’t be bothered with Nelson and its 13 business day reload speed.

@Smin1080p_WT Any Nuclear Escalation news planned for this week?

1 Like

I remember that the difference between the DM63 and the DM53 was only an improvement to the propellant, optimizing the safety of the ammunition.

I heard that it DM63 would actually take off like 10mm penetration ingame because of the new propellant

Honestly, Challenger 3 (TD) could perfecly a great 12.7 tank IF Gaijin fixed its reload to 5 seconds like all other Challengers and gave it the DM63 shell it was presented with, removing the tank’s main weakness (ammorack through the mantlet).

Adding all CR2s their missing hull spall liners would help a lot as well.

2 Likes

7 Likes

There is alot of stuff they could do to fix the CR2s but they wont as they think its already fixed from the one dev blog they did about it which actually didnt do anything

i hope they have an interesting vehicles that they did not tease yet, soo far these devblogs are boring

Literally all the difference is lmao it’s irrelevant for the game

Anymore news for the day?

Shouldn’t take anything off to any meaningful different maybe 5 or less

(I’m just a suggestion moderator guys, I know nothing more than y’all)

Visually it seems like no CM yet, we’ll have to see for when it’s fully added to see if it will get them. Very interesting! (it’s obviously not finished yet).


The prototype IRL didn’t have them built-in, so they would have to added according to the planned designs.

4 Likes