Accepted:
I had it work somehow against a random TOW from the sad chinese version (not tow2) idk how
some of these aren’t even available cus they date back to the OLD FORUM (2022), FOUR YEARS AGO
2 Likes
Anyone know the dev blog for today?
Yep :(
Premium PUMA (IFV)
1 Like
thx
*Puma
Its not called PUMA IRL, only Gaijin refuses to fix there names
yes im aware the sepv1 is better but im comparing off the end of line vehicles idk why you have an issue with that, and i dont need to play them considering like every abrams variant plays almost the exact same past 11.7 also compared to the 122b+ your right the mobility isnt to different but the sep and sepv2 both have better mobility than the 2a7 by a decent bit and again a faster reload with a similarly performing round. crying about not getting the SEPV3 because you somehow believe the SEPV2 isnt a counterpart when all its doing is trading armour and survivability for firepower and mobility not to mention the better capability of the SEPV2 carrying MPAT over the 2A7V only getting DM11 and not much on it unless you take hull ammo in which you become a German nuclear bomb, and the 122B+ doesnt even get proxy fuse rounds so were looking at the abrams over the 122 having a better round with a better reload rate better ammo stowage being able to take over double the ammo without issue and able to take some anti helicopter rounds or planes in some cases and you get 2 .50 cals which while being a small buff is a buff but apparently none of that matters because the 122B+ has better armour when your gonna aiming in the same place as you do with everything else? and better survivability which isnt important because like 99% of the time you get LFP your either dead or disabled? and the abrams over the 2a7 gets a better reload with only a slightly worse round but better ready rack better mobility and again much better ammo stowage because you can take more than 16 rounds and still have no hull ammo sure ive never played the sepv1 or v2 but it doesnt take playing them to have basic comprehension on how they are
Funny thing is that I made them too, and then I re-made it on the new website, got accepted, still nothing done lol
We even made a whole report thru Smin on the LFP and UFP and guess what? Nothing
))))
could however be a nice sqaudron vehicle
Still waiting for the ASCOD
Idc, its PUMA to me because big means good
Marder 2 better be a tt vehicle
I dont see it in dev catagorie
cuz we still have yet to get it
1 Like
ah ok
Except it really doesn’t get that much of a mobility advantage. The differences in firepower, armor and survivability are massive between those 2 tanks. Meanwhile the mobility difference is barely noticable in most scenarios.
I don’t get why this is so hard to realize.
2 Likes
I mean, as a German premium (possibly BR 9.7/10.3), I would have chosen another vehicle. Preferably a Marder 2.