Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Think. Subscribe

Actually logical and beneficial (for air) sub tree idea

4 agm12b in good hands its broken

so apparently a US and UK bombs are universal as shown here with a Lancaster with both US and UK bombs
image

2 Likes

Everyone has bias, but the important is that the sum of all bias is null. Though currently it isn’t because clearly russian bias (or smth) /j

The only reason I got the Tu-95M was so I could use it for CAS in this lineup

2 Likes

this line up cost double my laptop

3 Likes

its now a higher br than the G91 when they have the same capability

-15 quickly becomes -1.5 lol

Aircraft are too fragile. If you hit the ground faster than 15 m/s the aircraft will erupt into a massive fireball explosion. Bombers get diced into pieces from a single bullet. If bombers had any amount of survivability they would be much more enjoyable.

same except im using only the T10m

1 Like

German bias (maybe the Nord is worse or something like that)

It’s wild what this lineup costs now compared to what I (partially) payed for it back in the day

American bias with F-15 at 12.7? Chinese bias with Su-30 at 13.3, who knows

8.7 line is better for me to put the tu-95

Spoiler

French bias with M.B.157 at 3.3

that thing should be 13.7 but ok

The word bias has essentially been redefined as anything good.

1 Like

give me the Victor

fun fact it was never built but there was a purposed variant that would carry 2-4 GAM-87 Skybolts

okay renzo we see you with your IS-7 lmao

1 Like