both only as event vehicles, it barely counts
and the qn506 has significant problems
1 Like
yea the Namer has almost the same mass with the Merkava MK-4M ( and somehow the MK.4 are only 5t heavier that the Mk.1)
spikes are useless.
they hit the tracks, the barrel, any place that doesnt kill.
despite litterly having VIDEO evidence of hits
lol
4 Likes
im pretty sure theyre the exact same arent they?
The QN506 is a fairly old event vehicle
the things that gaijin did does not make sense physically.
gaijin: oh, a merkava without the turret, but with the same weight? the armor must be way worse, and the mobilty too.
1 Like
or the video of the TOW-2B that is top attack and blows up the entire soviet tank
yea but without a turret
well obviously they must fill the tank with extra explosive to make it look better right? /s
Thats mostly due to gaijin not understanding EFPs
no.
the simplest explanation is
think of it as a Merkava Mk.4 where the turret was removed and the hull was uparmored to match the weight.
1 Like
aren’t the MK.4 80t ?
yeah its so obvious something is wrong, but just because we dont have “sources” or “evidence” we’re the ones in the wrong
No, it just means you have to wait
1 Like
79 no mine prot, 84 with
Nah it just means Israeli OPSEC is too good, so you guys cant even bug report it if u want
Unfortunately that means the same for Singaporean OPSEC too so I cant report the Hunter if there’s any inaccuracy
Its beautiful, it even pens from 10 feet above the tank… gaijin pls
cause you wont be playing anymore or?
Sometimes any nations documents are so well protected it takes around 2 years to decipher them after they are marked ‘accepted’
