The M1A2 AIM physically doesn’t exist. It’s not even a paper vehicle, it’s straight fantasy.
Australia went from the M1A1 AIM straight to the SEPv3, so even if we overlook the fact that the M1A2 AIM doesn’t exist, Australia wouldn’t get it since they never used it.
2 M1A2s for top tier US at the same time? yeah right.
You have to huff massive amounts of copium and/or hopium to actually believe this one.
Day 1 of supporting this. Splitting nations should never be the end goal.
I understand there can be one-off additions for nations that don’t have a home, which might not be in the same tree, but having a nation officially split up long term like this is just disrespectful.
the KH38MT should never have been added, weather its real or not which i still dont think it is adding a mach 2.2 IR + IOG + GNSS missile with 95KG explosive mass and a seeker that somehow is better than every nato targeting pod and is very fake is stupid
using it on the su34 which is the 2nd worst 38mt slinger i still got a 93.8% winrate in a session with it facing iris t on that note
(edit number 3) i think it should have been at most added to the su34 but putting it on the Su30SM AND SM2 is a horrible decision
Thailand has pretty much the bottom end of the VT-4. This would even be slightly worse than the 12.3 VT-4 in the Chinese techtree since Thailand used slightly worse BTA-4 APFSDS instead of DTC10-125