C&P, its just the RAF’s designation for the B-29 Super fortress
9 Likes
We are still missing dozens of Japanese mass produced WWII aircrafts, but sure, lets add more Bri’ish WWII stuff.
1 Like
Called it.
1 Like
The BV 155 is pretty good fun at low altitudes. If the Welkin has alright turn performance due to the similar wing modelling it might be fun too
A pair of them? Oh boy, that’s lovely
There isnt anything in the 2.3 BR gap the Washington is specifically going to fill. Which it also did historically between Lincon and Canberra.
What does this have to do with Britain getting a new bomber? For one, its an aircraft. For seconds, its got nothing to do with any French or Italian vehicle developments.
7 Likes
is there any significant difference between the welkin mk1 and the mk1 late?
2 Likes
Tbf I think that picture represents all of us anytime a plane/helicopter flies overhead lmao
Nice! What is the climb speed going to be though?
Go back about the PZH’s thingy. Which you quoted me. Its a reaction on that.
Wait, did the shackleton get foldered?
Atp I feel like Smin just keeps a list to himself on the buggers that keeps annoying him lol
3 Likes
I just cope for leopards im innocent
While I’m not much of a WWII guy (I tend to fixate more on cold war aviation), those are some gorgeous aircraft, and I’m glad to see more stuff from this era being added :)
2 Likes
The Smin Files.
5 Likes
Another T-2 and T-2 Early situation, where a premium gap is covered by a vehicle which no written resources are present.
Da, either Leopard or H145M))))
Or bug fixes or Wiesel MELLS :)
I once again keep praying for challenger 1 falcon
1 Like
On the topic of British B-29, it should have come 10 years ago. Please just model a B-50 too if you are going to give B-29 series some love