Sepv3 may never come :(
It’s probably going to be 14.3, since the Sufa is 14.0
It can’t really be 14.0 as the significantly worse Sufa sits there, so it will be 14.3 at minimum.
I just want more goofy little light tanks ;-;
I’m dying of thirst here
I can’t believe they choose to give a Block 52 with an engine that performs worse than the prior block 50
Sufa being a higher BR than something like an SU-27SM or any of the 13.3 flankers is geniunely one of the weirdest things i’ve ever seen. It should be 13.7 and the flankers should move up.
Longer term, yes for sure they are a consideration just as the Boxer always was for Germany too. However for the foreseeable future, other requested vehicles are lined up currently.
Might just be the skin, a block 50 is likely
Watch F-15C GE with AIM-120D still remain at the same BR because it doesn’t move the needle in any way either.
Respectfully none of that changes the correctional response I made to Shini. We seem to be going in circles at this point that simply wasn’t required. At this point, its been answered several times.
None of what you just mentioned was in dispute. Simply the claimed “Britain wasn’t involved in development”, which factually was not correct
I really hope so dude
! ! !!! !/! ! ! !!!/! !!! !!! !!! !!!/!!! !!! !!! !!! !!!/! !!! !!! !!! !!!
I mean it’s probably gonna be 14.3 or even 14.7 for the sake of adding a 14.7 to USA, a PW engine would be the final nail of the coffin lmao
Ah i see the theme of this R&R thread is now German main coping, good to know.
Oh its 100% gonna go up to 14.7 because gaijin probably believes adding 30 seconds more battery life to one of the worst top tier Fox-3’s in the game will change its effectiveness when the real problem is it’s lacking manouverability.
Surely you are talking about the Ferret and the AA Valkyr

Im personally just hoping for a general AIM-120 buff, and the C-5 to go upto dev server levels of seeker capability and pull again. It had the seeker of a MICA with better turn than 120A/B.
coping on what? defending an argument?
cursory search suggests type 1942C (never laid down)