They are gonna turn that one into an event vehicle, aren’t they?
I love my Ka-Chi and I need the proper Ka-Mi!
They are gonna turn that one into an event vehicle, aren’t they?
I love my Ka-Chi and I need the proper Ka-Mi!
in the development of the CRV 2 programm, that is correct.
It was a programm of germany and australia.
Britain is part of gtk boxer / base platform. but i differentiate those .
Just asking but this poBIT looks like a block 52 with the Pratt and Whitney isn’t it?
yup, its nearly the Abrams SEP treatment all over again.
It started in 1993 between France & Germany, the UK joined only in 1996. As France left in 1999, the Netherlands joined in 2001, and the UK withdrew in 2003.
Yes, the development wasn’t just finished between 2003 and 2009, but out of the 16 years of development, the UK was only in it for 7, i.e less than 50%
And I took my time in reading their discussion, it was about the Boxer CRV itself, both the Block I and Block II, and how the UK had no part in its development, which yes, is 100% true, the British did not take part in developing the CRV for Australia, nor for Germany.
He 280, Ta 183, Panzer 68/88/87, Leopard 2-140, PT-91 Twardy, Saab 35Ö Draken, Europanzer, Panzer 53. Why can’t we introduce THIS, and not just another sub-clone… It’s so offensive, I just don’t know.
fr we need this for Japan and Poland
holy copium. And why is it still because of German/british tree vehicle decisions ahah
What’s wrong with the Hungarian planes and the BTR-3E?
Most coordinated euro development:
Britains complained why the australian boxer didnt stay exclusice longer to them
Brits seemingly wanted the Aussie Boxer CRV to remain “unique” for more time, and got angry about Germany getting the CRV Block II, lol.
Well goodnight gentlelads and gals, J15T was a very welcome surprise
Honestly the most exciting thing about a polish tree to me is seeing the german mains mald over the czech me262.
Literally the same story over and over again
Joint project with France, other nations join, France leaves
wait did i miss something???, when did that happen?
Yeah the reg number is of a Block 52 with the F100-PW-229 engine.

join project, refuse to elaborate, leave
real chad
Which still confirms the statement as incorrect that I was correcting, so thank you:
Britain very much did partake in the development of the Boxer family.
15 minutes ago