we have su27sm at 13.7 with about only like 2 less fox 3 missiles
so much focus for a little piece of bread
while I’m here, I’d love an updated pfp but instead of mirage it’s rafale in the background kthnxbai
oh dude I didn’t consider that option, you’re absolutely right, that’s a big possibility
I agree, but still. I just dont see gaijin making it all that good. I really think the way they’re gonna model it is just a c-5 with better lofting. I doubt we’ll see any hobs improvement nor much noticable range improvement. After what they did to c-5, im just not optimistic.
2 Likes
I dont care if its ai generated thats beutiful.
given the basic R-77 non 1 is pretty mid compared to any AIM-120 variant in everything except offbore, doesnt really matter lol
7 Likes
That is true.
Yeah missile count is a major one, but also:
- Mid ahh Radar.
- Mediocre sensors and coverage.
- Flight model only beats the Su-30SM2, gets rolled by the EFT and Rafale.
- Only 120 normal countermeasures.
1 Like
It could also get a better seeker the C-5
C-5 is already supposed to have a better seeker than a/b but it doesn’t. See my point?
1 Like
yeah but makes up for with a decent airframe since the buff a few weeks ago. to be fair i think the f18c should probably be the same br as it not the i will admit aesa is a massive bonus.
Theres definitely a lot of good pfps they could create for France
inb4 the seeker “improvements” being only GNSS and a slightly wider gimbal limit for HOBS launches
i do always forget the rwr coverage for the su27s are horrible arent they.
Then again it has 12 120s, and soon to be 12 120Ds, shouldnt see 12.7
yeah but to be fair f15 e and mirage 2000 with micas probably shouldnt face anything below 13.3 but they do compression just sucks all around.
The lowest it sees is 13.3 currently
I think the F18e is fine at 14.3 as it stands, if it gets 120d and 120d isnt terrible it could easily go to 14.7 imo.