nah got to at least be out ther eand pretend its not only a naval devblog but a submarine one have vision man.
It’s good because of that but also armor and firepower somehow better then Yamato and better overall survival
2 Likes
Henry! but where’s flying kipper?
The visual model off the ammo racks is smaller than the actual hitbox, that’s not the problem. Its armour scheme is the problem, being almost perfect for the way the game works
2 Likes
Wdym? Shipyards all over the USSR were working overtime during/after ww2 lol
3 Likes
The ammo compartments’ damage model is fine, only visually too small.
The main issue with Soyuz is:
Historically, Russians couldn’t make cemented armor plates thicker than 230mm. To make up for it, they designed Soyuz with extra-thick armor of less quality…
However, ingame, they gave it BOTH that thickness AND the cemented multipliers; thus making it stronger than it could ever have been. None of the plates thicker than 230mm should be cemented.
It also for some reason has a faster rate of fire than Iowa, while also using shells that penetrate as much while having more than twice the TNT equivalent compared to Yamato’s.
3 Likes
The pen isn’t the biggest deal, the shells existed so there is some reference there.
But yeah armour quality and rate of fire are a bit dubious
3 Likes
wow man do i not understand what all those issues mean, this is what is must feel like to f4s players watching us all argue about the 14.3 and 14.7s balance.
I cast non aesa radar at 14.0
You have failed your perception roll.
here shall be my question of annoyance for trailer night, should the f22 come in a early variant and late variant?
i.e early would be it now as in it gets aim120D-3, 9m’s(or 9x if they introduce them) no HMS and late being HMS, aim260, aim9x, aim120D-3, stealth IRST, Stealth undercarriage pods (we know the fuel pods are done now do to a recent expo, but I still hold out for those ace combat stealth weapon pods)
No hms at top tier would a death sentence at whatever br this would be at
But then again I’m guessing arb would turn very bvr heavy with 5th gen
Don’t even give them the idea.
Yeah, basically; representing the plane during the early 2000 and the 2020s.
I wonder how f22, f35 and friends will fare without link16
I see them probably doing both the two variants (annoyingly) but giving both hms like how we will probably see the later rafale have the meteors and the mica ir with hms and are current one that shouldnt has it anyways
F-22 will be blind, untill you research U-2 modification at rank IV, that will spawn a U-2 translating all that data for you :P