A Tor would be nice for GB though… But it should come as an “extra”, not as a main addition.
Its a different modification. There were different subvariants of PFM. The event one added to the Soviet tree was the one with Kh-66 modification. Not all export variants had that capacity.
Ahhh, fair enough then :)
Had hope it was just a Opsie :(
I’d much rather have a Cactus SAM with SAHV missiles
(or even better, a G6 ZA-HVM)
Same for tons of other vehicles that are just easy C&P. E.g. the He-112 for Japan and the PZH2000 for the Netherlands. These things should NEVER be implemented as “main” addition but rather as an “extra” addition because there is a skin for it. C&P should never be a “main” addition. Not even with slight differences.
E.g. a PZH2000 with no visual difference except 30 less horse power is still C&P and not unique.
So please, add the Tor and Shilka to GB, but not as a main addition.
Everyone, but its not easy model C&P or Russian derived (e.g. the entire malaysian Sub-TT or Hungary air).
Ugh
True
just… please gaijin, give me an I-Derby ER…
Tunguska ftw
Right, forgot about that one
Absolutely necessary additions, screw the Arjun, Zorawar, Tejas, Prachand, Rudra, etc
Give me more copy paste USSR SPAAs
Theyve got those cool camos though!
next week
I mean considering the f-16i is at 14.0 I would assume f-16s upgraded over the baseline block 50/52 would be automatic 14.0 as well
@Smin1080p_WT may I ask what this answer is?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/3hEKtOmKj9bz
Because how is a IR-Jammer supposed to Jam the Radar?
Is it now RADARLDIRCM?
It’s just using a radar proxy fuse.
Ldircm doesn’t jam the proxy fuse it jams the seekerhead to where it veers off course which never allows proxy to activate
Gaijin:
F-16 With AESA and Aim-120C8 = 13.7 because its US
they gonna move the F-16C down to 13.3 while they are at it
and the 16 ADF to 13.0
F-16V or Pobit at 14.0 with MiG-35TD at 14.0 to fill that bracket
Nah just F-16V/PoBIT, Gaijin won’t bother adding a new fulcrum.
They’ll add another flanker instead