It is also a 3.3 coastal boat, where those guns might actually do something, at least against some targets.
A single 4.5" gun, even with its high RoF would leave it terribly undergunned for fighting other destroyers, let alone anything larger. Would be a real shame to limit Britain to a SAM only destroyer when there are mutliple SACLOS destroyers already ingame and have been for years
Perhaps… though if balance was really the name of the game, there wouldnt be this large a gap between additions. Bravys have been causing chaos since 2023 and a smart one is a pain to deal with
Honestly i never really found Bravy to be much of an issue. It can be annoying yes but its alot less annoying than a well played gearing or god forbid a Wilkinson with more than 1iq spawns.
Object 219M with Burlak would be nice for me personally. Which would basically a T-80BVM with a bustle autoloader and a hopefully slightly faster reload and an aps of some kind iirc but i dont remember which one.
Also this isnt a proper top tier vehicle but one of the Object 187 variants would be nice to see as well.
Brother, don’t talk about empire until you know about Iran’s past and what bad things happened in Iran, and the reason was that many of your politicians caused these bad things for the people of Iran. Long live the King of Kings, Cyrus the Great.
@Smin1080p_WT So after some thought it seems that Australia is likely going to be filler for the naval line of Britain that’s all well and fine as I don’t have an issue with this but what I’m confused about is that isn’t this what genuine subs nations meant to be for ?
India is one of those genuine subs but in terms of air tech most are locked behind one time events and premiums which isn’t a lot compared to a non sub nations meanwhile Australia not only covers the premium side for ground but also has quite a lot of aircraft in the main tree. So who do the devs decide who gets’ to be a sub and who doesn’t ?