Its another Stryker and its pretty :)
500 more strykers please!
Every time you ask it gets pushed back by 3 months
This is the first one for the US, and something a fair few wanted to see.
9 Likes
By no means to offend you
But m1296 is 12 years after the launch of m1129
Looks very likely it should be after M1129 and BR wise
Probably because it wasn’t designed too?
Its a different class of vehicle.
7 Likes
Please stop spamming
1 Like
Spamming the topic doesnt make come any quicker to the game.
5 Likes
That’s very good, and very appreciated. A little surprising that it’s the Dragoon over the LAV-25, but still extremely nice. Now it’s time to address this:
sowwy 😞😞
introduction dates means nothing mate, it is comparable to other 9.7 ifvs like the vbci2
That’s an early blog
how many strykers does U.S even have holy moly
Any changes or improvements to Spyder AiO we could see in upcoming patch?
1 Like
thats MY guy!!
I know what you are trying to say
But this thing looks like it will face bmpt
It will simply banother Ajex weeks ago
I invite you guys takes good care of its br…
Furthermore, I would like to inquire about potential positive adjustments to AIM 120 B and C.
Given that ARB is a converging process, and BVR eventually will turn into WVR
AMRAAM did kinda ok in BVR, but much worse than R77 and Mica in WVR.
Consider that both 120B and 120C get their own ECCM upgrade in real life
To compensate for the weakness in the flight model, should there be any upgrade to the 120 series, especially 120B and C, such as to make it harder to chaff away?
This would be a good move to balance its WVR performance
Much thanks
If they are missing ECCM performance that they had in real life, this should be reported with evidence on the CBR. Its not something done as a balance compensation.
2 Likes
Please make a most somewhere else to dicuss this missile. It has nothing to do with the next major
2 Likes
Deleted, apologies.
Can there be consideration for Gaijin to add the AIM-120D-3 instead of the baseline AIM-120D?