Which is a Boxer family vehicle, in which Britain had development into.
What’s wrong with them? That’s right, I didn’t say anything about Italy and Japan. Two planes + infantry fighting vehicles, ok, I’m asking for Germany here
Who lmao?!
The only complaint I’ve seen are from people are about the name/model
(Given that the Aussie CRV is called a block 2, but is clearly the demonstrator/trials vehicle)
Not only that but if it were to be added to Germany that would of been a third nation split that Australia doesn’t warrant.
J-15 = J-11B with AESA + CAS ?
So, are you complaining about the Boxer then?
French people joining a collaborative project realizing that means they have to collaborate: >:0
oh no he also wants PT-91 for Germany
Sadly not with the statement as it was. However this discussion now has become so, as its been answered and concluded several times.
I don’t like that the Titular Nation, instead of adding sane vehicles to BR 6.0 - 10.0, is introducing clones instead of new vehicles that would improve the win rate and diversity of the TITLE NATION
So germany developed CR 3 as well good to know i guess
Engine like F-16I Sufa and Singapore F-16D+ ?
You know, for being told the update would be “light for aircraft”, the trailer sure had quite a bit of time dedicated to aircraft.
can german mains not shut up with the cope for one update?
Different nations have different contributions to projects. Its not exactly new news.
Apparently they want to out do us in the who most suffers contest
was thinking that
Title Nation? Wym?
Also, the Boxer being a bit of a “clone” doesn’t matter, it’s a German vehicle
So how about that Ho-Ni II huh? Can’t wait to get my hands on that in the live servers!
To be fair. That ones on the brits for stating the schwerer waffenträger shouldnt have been added.
And the australian version should have stayed exclusive to UK for a lo ger while