Nah, that’s too OP
Can’t have the full missile load on these vehicles for whatever reason
oh alright, ill check and see if its actually noticeable or not
Compared to other aircraft at that BR:
Anemic missile count
Meh radar with terrible gimbal angles, arguably the worst ESA
Mediocre flight performance
No 360 RWR, no MAWS etc.
Surely it’s going to be competitive… right?
It gets better! wait till’ they announce it has a different FM and its actually worse than Blk 50.
They totally understood the US 14.7 problem and solved it spot on. /s
full missile load its gonna be around 36 that is removing all capacity for extra cannon ammo, ik it has 2 sets of storage racks wich each can hold 6 or around 300-400 rounds per rack
That is, untill you decide to compare dimensions, and you realize that with this shelve layout, no missiles would fit
ignore the darker screen its an extension for my browser
thats at 3000m too. the higher you go the bigger the difference i think.
yea youre probably right, so thats good to know at least
Pretty much 0 difference +
AIM-120C5 pulls SIGNIFICANTLY less and is SIGNIFICANTLY slower within 10 km
This makes it a straight downgrade, the AIM-120A can hit every shot the AIM-120C5 can.
Calling it, it’s gonna get 4 Spikes, just like the CRV
Meanwhile the Freccias have 10
i was under the impression that the c was always worse at 20km and below, but if youre fast it can be better
Since we’re in the last messages and we need to continue topics between parts:
bread.
That compartmen ends before the 1st rear wheels pair…
oh yea i know im still always taking 120bs when im done with bvr lol, but its worth giving the c credit for being a little better than i thought before
This topic was automatically closed after reaching the maximum limit of 10000 replies. Continue discussion at Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3).