Unless there is new information to show Mach 3 in specific ranges or conditions, the comment from the devs is final. The source claims the missile can achieve mach 3 and it can in game.
Thanks, fixed.
Real, the rest of the commonwealth jets have more variety and exciting than the Hornets that we already have. I mean add them is fine but please don’t add them repeatedly for 3 patches it is so boring please make better timing. They always have other choices from commonwealth as well as India and South Africa which bring different to Britain right now.
i’ve consistenttly seen people ask for AUS/CAN stuff (AIM and Hornets for example) both before and after india was confirmed as a subtree, i think the T-90S kicked a lot of it off
The T-90S didn’t help but I think what really started it was the C2 MEXAS and M1A1 AIM
Mission Accepted…
i’m not 100% on the timeline so i’m not sure if AIM or T-90 was first, but ik Mexas came well before both
though a lot of that stems from ignorance/purposefully ignoring that Indias requirements radically changed the tank operationally and visually tbf from the initial bid offer made which wasnt suitable for them. People use the term “copy-paste slop” way too much and completely throw real life situations and development out the window when its convenient for them on a personal wanting level.
Apparently expecting Gaijin to add something like a South African Mirage III or F1 is too much to ask for
Doesn’t even have to be the Cheetah or Tejas at this point, just add stuff to the subtrees. Like, what’s the point of having two subtrees if you’re just gonna add stuff from third party nations instead?
RB75T is just an HE warhead of AGM65A 3km max track distance for moving targets and wont tracking a moving target until 3km, can travel from 12km out but will only start using its seeker at 3km just like the AGM65A so its not an upgraded AGM its just a 65A with a HE warhead as thats literally in the name T(tung) stands for Heavy
You can literally see its a different warhead strapped to the AGM 65A
You gonna write Diehl another E-Mail?
May I ask why we have to prove in the first place why we need an conformation Of mach 3 inside the 40km?
Because this sound just wierd.
Mach 3 capable Missile needs an target outside its range for Mach 3
Yes…
Anyone wants to bet they ignore me?
how come the devs have been so dishonest and used a range of 64km to acheive barely mach 3 velocity when the maximum effective range of SLM is 40km?
why would anyone list mach 3 speed if it cannot be acheived within the range of the missile?
Timeline is C2A1 (2020) → M1A1 AIM (2022) → T-90S (2023)
You’ve been waiting for this haven’t you
its premium XD
Yes I have