Yes but from what you’ve already explained before, it means the Indians vehicles that don’t go to Britain won’t go anywhere at all which is sad because either they add vehicles that don’t fit the British tree, or they don’t add them at all
Normalize adding export vehicles to their nation of origin more often
This is the case for all sub trees in game. Not just India.
1 Like
Sure, I just find it sad
Imo India should be like how you described Canada, can go to any nation that needs/fits it best
1 Like
I find it good because that means that nations with a solid subtree are definetly always in the same tree and thus Lineups with only this nation can be made
Then a different group of people are unhappy that a nations vehicles are split over multiple trees. So really there is no way to satisfy all in every case.
5 Likes
I’m curious about the state of countermeasures on the F-16s and F-15s in game.
Recently, the F-16A ADF/MLUs received similar treatment to the F-16A OCU, where the visual model suggests 45 total countermeasures with one 15x large caliber and one 30x regular sized CM dispensers.
Will the same apply for other F-16s and F-15s in game that have similar situations with their respective visual models?
From what I can tell, all the F-15s in game are affected by this, where they should have 60x large caliber and 120x regular caliber CMs. The exception to this is the F-15I, which should have 60/240.
For the F-16s, the CM count varies from version to version of course, but an example would be the F-16C getting 30x large caliber and 60x regular caliber CMs.
Another concern is the Belgian F-16AM, which has a 15/30 setup for the visual model, but it gets 120x CMs total.
Anyways, all that exposition aside…
My question: Are the devs aware of these other discrepancies? Are there plans to update/correct/ignore some of them due to balancing? And is there a time span where we can expect any changes to go through?
imo gaijin’s comprimises so far were good enough for most group’s wishes and thus they fulfill their purpose
Britian also doesnt need all these new sub trees,
ik we want to add variety, but i would rather have nations being added as subtrees to the nations which use the vehicles more
like pakistan → china
bangladesh → china
australia → USA
canada → USA
singapore → Germany
ik there is also a lot of issues in this as well, usa and germany doesnt need more sub trees,
there are major issues in both the ways they can be added
The devs make the changes after reviewing reports forwarded for consideration as suggestions. So if there is an open report, you can take it as “known”. If not, then it likely isn’t.
@Smin1080p_WT With the new cockpit coming for the RAH-66 next update any chance we will see some other improvements for it like the ability to retract the gun or replacing the ahistorical AGM-114B’s with K’s?
Singapore has no ties to Germany, and Germany already has a sufficient amount of sub trees in my opinion
Canada and Australia wouldn’t bring anything new to the US tree as the only ties they have to the US are that they buy their stuff
4 Likes
There currently is no mechanism in game for a gun system like that on helicopters. Weaponary suggestions are independent of any content developments (such as cockpits).
I can see that, it’s hard to satisfy everyone. But something that would help a lot would be… nation folders! When are we getting these?
2 Likes
Tbh I’d rather have Canada, Australia and New Zealand form a new tree and see wherever ASEAN goes for Singapore.
3 Likes
This is already the case. So im not sure why its even being discussed / debated.
5 Likes
AFAIK AGM-114K and Brimstone II, III were denied entirely because they’re ARH+IOG Guided AGMs that would leave no chance for ground vehicles to escape
No current plans. Sub tree vehicles complement and help fill gaps in the main tree.
2 Likes
So it’s official, Pakistani is a subtree of China?
1 Like
114K is laser guided. We already have it in-game on many US helicopters. You’re thinking of AGM-114L
I see. It will take a lot of reporting to get things fixed. I am also hoping in-game precedent should be enough to get a proper look, not outside sources.
If I have to get sources for all these planes outside screenshots, it’s not worth it for me to report them. But if the devs are consistent with how they treated the ADF/MLU/OCUs, hopefully they will do the same for other vehicles with equivalent issues/discrepancies.